Modeling and optimization of bioethanol production from breadfruit starch hydrolyzate vis-à-vis response surface methodology and artificial neural network

• Published in: Renewable energy Vol. 74; pp. 87 - 94
• Main Authors: Betiku, Eriola, Taiwo, Abiola Ezekiel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2015
• Subjects: Artificial neural network; Bioethanol; Breadfruit; Fermentation; Learning theory; Mathematical models; Neural networks; Optimization; Response surface methodology; Starches; Volume fraction; Yeast; Bioethanol; Yeast; Response surface methodology; Artificial neural network; Optimization; Breadfruit
• ISSN: 0960-1481; 1879-0682
• DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.054

This study investigated the use of Breadfruit Starch Hydrolysate (BFSH) as the sole carbon source for bioethanol production and the optimization of the fermentation parameters. The results showed that the yeast was able to utilize the BFSH with and without nutrient supplements, with highest bioethanol yield of 3.96 and 3.60% volume fraction, respectively after 24 h of fermentation. A statistically significant quadratic regression model (p < 0.05) was obtained for bioethanol yield prediction. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) optimal condition values established for the bioethanol yield were BFSH concentration of 134.81 g L−1, time of 21.33 h and pH of 5.01 with predicted bioethanol yield of 3.95% volume fraction. Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN), multilayer normal feedforward incremental back propagation with hyperbolic tangent function gave the best performance as a predictive model for bioethanol yield. ANN optimal condition values were BFSH concentration of 120 g L−1, time of 24 h and pH of 4.5 with predicted bioethanol yield of 4.21% volume fraction. The predicted bioethanol yield was validated experimentally as 4.10% volume fraction and 4.22% volume fraction for RSM and ANN, respectively. Coefficient of Determination (R2) and Absolute Average Deviation (AAD) were determined as 1 and 0.09% for ANN and 0.9882 and 1.67% for RSM, respectively. Thus, confirming ANN was better than RSM in both data fittings and estimation capabilities. [Display omitted] •Breadfruit starch hydrolyzate was successfully converted to bioethanol.•Bioethanol production process was modeled and optimized using RSM and ANN.•Bioethanol yield from the RSM and ANN models were 4.10 and 4.22% vol, respectively.•ANN was superior to RSM in both predictability and data fittings.•Breadfruit hydrolyzate could serve as the sole carbon source for bioethanol production.