Possible Origin of the Gamma-ray Discrepancy in the Summation Calculations of Fission Product Decay Heat

In order to identify the origin of the ubiquitous and long-standing discrepancy seen in the γ-ray component of the FP decay heat in the cooling time range 300-3,000 s, a comprehensive analysis of the differences between the summation calculations and the experiments has been carried out. There may b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of nuclear science and technology Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 135 - 142
Main Authors YOSHIDA, Tadashi, TACHIBANA, Takahiro, STORRER, François, OYAMATSU, Kazuhiro, KATAKURA, Jun-ichi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Taylor & Francis 01.02.1999
Atomic Energy Society of Japan
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In order to identify the origin of the ubiquitous and long-standing discrepancy seen in the γ-ray component of the FP decay heat in the cooling time range 300-3,000 s, a comprehensive analysis of the differences between the summation calculations and the experiments has been carried out. There may be some missing of the β-strength in the high energy region of the FPs in the mass region A=100-110. Especially, 102 Tc, 104 Tc, 105 Tc and 108 Rh are potentially responsible for the γ-ray discrepancy seen in the three major fissioning nuclides, 235 U, 238 U and 239 Pu, systematically. The β-strength functions are theoretically calculated in order to validate this possibility. It is proved that the chance for finding the additional β-strength required to solve the discrepancy is not so large but still exists, and the exact β-feed from Tc to the highly excited levels in Rb should be identified experimentally. Finally, the impact of the β-ray discrepancy on the reactor-core decay heat is evaluated quantitatively for the first time. It may introduce 0.5-1% underestimation of the total FP decay heat from 1 to 2,000 s after reactor shutdown, and the underestimation may reach 3% at the maximum when the γ-ray component of the decay heat is separately taken into consideration.
ISSN:0022-3131
1881-1248
DOI:10.1080/18811248.1999.9726191