Possible Origin of the Gamma-ray Discrepancy in the Summation Calculations of Fission Product Decay Heat
In order to identify the origin of the ubiquitous and long-standing discrepancy seen in the γ-ray component of the FP decay heat in the cooling time range 300-3,000 s, a comprehensive analysis of the differences between the summation calculations and the experiments has been carried out. There may b...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of nuclear science and technology Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 135 - 142 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Tokyo
Taylor & Francis
01.02.1999
Atomic Energy Society of Japan |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In order to identify the origin of the ubiquitous and long-standing discrepancy seen in the γ-ray component of the FP decay heat in the cooling time range 300-3,000 s, a comprehensive analysis of the differences between the summation calculations and the experiments has been carried out. There may be some missing of the β-strength in the high energy region of the FPs in the mass region A=100-110. Especially,
102
Tc,
104
Tc,
105
Tc and
108
Rh are potentially responsible for the γ-ray discrepancy seen in the three major fissioning nuclides,
235
U,
238
U and
239
Pu, systematically. The β-strength functions are theoretically calculated in order to validate this possibility. It is proved that the chance for finding the additional β-strength required to solve the discrepancy is not so large but still exists, and the exact β-feed from Tc to the highly excited levels in Rb should be identified experimentally. Finally, the impact of the β-ray discrepancy on the reactor-core decay heat is evaluated quantitatively for the first time. It may introduce 0.5-1% underestimation of the total FP decay heat from 1 to 2,000 s after reactor shutdown, and the underestimation may reach 3% at the maximum when the γ-ray component of the decay heat is separately taken into consideration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3131 1881-1248 |
DOI: | 10.1080/18811248.1999.9726191 |