Predicting the Appropriate Use of Carotid Endarterectomy, Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and Coronary Angiography
MAINTAINING the quality of care in an increasingly cost-conscious environment is a goal of many health policy decision makers. The ability to achieve this goal may depend on the ability to determine the medical appropriateness of care. We define a procedure or service as appropriate if its health be...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 323; no. 17; pp. 1173 - 1177 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Massachusetts Medical Society
25.10.1990
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | MAINTAINING the quality of care in an increasingly cost-conscious environment is a goal of many health policy decision makers. The ability to achieve this goal may depend on the ability to determine the medical appropriateness of care. We define a procedure or service as appropriate if its health benefit exceeds its health risk (with the explicit exclusion of cost) by a sufficiently wide margin that the service or procedure is worth performing.
Using this definition, we studied three procedures — coronary angiography, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and carotid endarterectomy — in a geographically diverse sample of Medicare patients.
1
,
2
We examined only . . . |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199010253231705 |