A Comparison of Barrier Factors between Hospitals with and without Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Korea: A Nation-Wide Survey Research

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 11; no. 9; p. 2560
• Main Authors: Kim, Chul, Sung, Jidong, Han, Jae-Young, Jee, Sungju, Lee, Jang Woo, Lee, Jong Hwa, Kim, Won-Seok, Bang, Heui Je, Baek, Sora, Joa, Kyung-Lim, Kim, Ae Ryoung, Lee, So Young, Kim, Jihee, Kim, Chung Reen, Kwon, Oh Pum
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 02.05.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: barriers; cardiac rehabilitation; Cardiology; Cardiovascular disease; Clinical medicine; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Hospitals; Mortality; Participation; Patients; percutaneous coronary interventions; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation; Response rates; Statistical analysis; Surgeons; survey; survey; barriers; percutaneous coronary interventions; cardiac rehabilitation
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092560

The percentage of patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP) is very low (30-40%), and hospitals providing CRP are either insufficient or lacking, even in countries with advanced medical care; therefore, this study aims to investigate the barriers, as well as compare the differences between hospitals, with or without CRP. We conducted a survey, in which the questionnaire was distributed through post or email to 607 specialists who work at 164 hospitals performing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The results were as follows: (1) of the 164 hospitals, 132 responded (response rate: 80.5%). While all 47 hospitals with CRP responded (100%), from among the 117 hospitals without CRP, 85 responded (72.7%). (2) Of the 607 specialists, 227 responded (response rate: 36.9%). The response rates according to specialties were as follows: cardiologists (28.9%), cardiac surgeons (24.5%), and physiatrists (64.1%). (3) While the specialists at hospitals with CRP identified patient referral, transportation, and cost as the major barriers, for those at hospitals without CRP, all items were considered barriers, especially the items related to equipment, space, workforce, and budget as being more serious barriers. Therefore, in order to actively promote CRP, it is suggested that governments consider the customized support system according to the performance of CRPs.