Social and environmental transmission spread different sets of gut microbes in wild mice

• Published in: Nature ecology & evolution Vol. 8; no. 5; pp. 972 - 985
• Main Authors: Raulo, Aura, Bürkner, Paul-Christian, Finerty, Genevieve E., Dale, Jarrah, Hanski, Eveliina, English, Holly M., Lamberth, Curt, Firth, Josh A., Coulson, Tim, Knowles, Sarah C. L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.05.2024
• Subjects: 45/22; 45/23; 45/77; 631/158/853; 631/158/855; 631/553/2714; 631/601/18; Animals; Bacteria - classification; Bacteria - genetics; Bacteria - isolation & purification; Biological and Physical Anthropology; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Ecology; Evolutionary Biology; Female; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Life Sciences; Male; Mice; Murinae - microbiology; Paleontology; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - analysis; Social Behavior; Zoology
• ISSN: 2397-334X
• DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02381-0

Gut microbes shape many aspects of organismal biology, yet how these key bacteria transmit among hosts in natural populations remains poorly understood. Recent work in mammals has emphasized either transmission through social contacts or indirect transmission through environmental contact, but the relative importance of different routes has not been directly assessed. Here we used a novel radio-frequency identification-based tracking system to collect long-term high-resolution data on social relationships, space use and microhabitat in a wild population of mice ( Apodemus sylvaticus ), while regularly characterizing their gut microbiota with 16S ribosomal RNA profiling. Through probabilistic modelling of the resulting data, we identify positive and statistically distinct signals of social and environmental transmission, captured by social networks and overlap in home ranges, respectively. Strikingly, microorganisms with distinct biological attributes drove these different transmission signals. While the social network effect on microbiota was driven by anaerobic bacteria, the effect of shared space was most influenced by aerotolerant spore-forming bacteria. These findings support the prediction that social contact is important for the transfer of microorganisms with low oxygen tolerance, while those that can tolerate oxygen or form spores may be able to transmit indirectly through the environment. Overall, these results suggest social and environmental transmission routes can spread biologically distinct members of the mammalian gut microbiota. Long-term high-resolution data on social relationships, space use and microhabitat in a wild population of mice ( Apodemus sylvaticus ), accompanied by sampling of the gut microbiota, show that distinct sets of microorganisms dominate social and environmental transmission routes of microbiota. Microorganisms with low oxygen tolerance are more reliant on social transmission.