Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness

• Published in: Critical care (London, England) Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 208
• Main Authors: Garland, Allan, Olafson, Kendiss, Ramsey, Clare D, Yogendranc, Marina, Fransoo, Randall
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 20.08.2018; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adults; Analysis; Codes; Critical care; Critical illness; Critically ill persons; Gender; Health aspects; Health care access; Health care disparities; Health care quality, access, and evaluation; Health insurance; Hospital admission and discharge; Illnesses; Intensive care; Intensive care units; Mortality; Palliative care; Patients; Population; Pulmonary arteries; Womens health; Canada; United States > US; Manitoba Canada; Health care quality, access, and evaluation; Critical illness; Intensive care units
• ISSN: 1364-8535; 1466-609X; 1364-8535; 1366-609X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-2132-8

The consistently observed male predominance of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) has raised concerns about gender-based disparities in ICU access. Comparing rates of ICU admission requires choosing a normalizing factor (denominator), and the denominator usually used to compare such rates between subpopulations is the size of those subpopulations. However, the appropriate denominator is the number of people whose medical condition warranted ICU care. We devised an estimate of the number of critically ill people in the general population, and used it to compare rates of ICU admission by gender and income. This population-based, retrospective analysis included all adults in the Canadian province of Manitoba, 2004-2015. We created an estimate for the number of critically ill people who warrant ICU care, and used it as the denominator to generate critical illness-normalized rates of ICU admission. These were compared to the usual population-normalized rates of ICU care. Men outnumbered women in ICUs for all age groups; population-normalized male:female rate ratios significantly exceed 0 for every age group, ranging from 1.15 to 2.10. Using critical-illness normalized rates, this male predominance largely disappeared; critically ill men and women aged 45-74 years were admitted in equivalent proportions (critical-illness normalized rate ratios 0.96-1.01). While population-normalized rates of ICU care were higher in lower income strata (p < 0.001), the gradient for critical illness-based rates was reversed (p < 0.001). Across a 30-year adult age span, the male predominance of ICU patients was accounted for by higher estimated rates of critical illness among men. People in lower income strata had lower critical-illness normalized rates of ICU admission. Our methods highlight that correct inferences about access to healthcare require calculating rates using denominators appropriate for this purpose.