Systematic evaluation of spatial resolution and gamma criteria for quality assurance with detector arrays in stereotactic radiosurgery

• Published in: Journal of applied clinical medical physics Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. e14274 - n/a
• Main Authors: Stedem, Ann‐Kathrin, Tutty, Mark, Chofor, Ndimofor, Langhans, Marco, Kleefeld, Christoph, Schönfeld, Andreas A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.02.2024; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Arrays; detector arrays; Dosimetry; Error correction & detection; Fourier transforms; gamma index; Planning; quality assurance; Quality control; Radiation Measurements; Radiation therapy; Radiosurgery; Sensors; stereotactic radiosurgery; Florida; Palo Alto California; United States > US; detector arrays; gamma index; quality assurance; stereotactic radiosurgery
• ISSN: 1526-9914; 1526-9914
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14274

Purpose To characterize detector array spacing and gamma index for quality assurance (QA) of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) deliveries. Use the Nyquist theorem to determine the required detector spacing in SRS fields, and find optimal gamma indices to detect MLC errors using the SRS MapCHECK, ArcCHECK, and a portal imaging device (EPID). Methods The required detector spacing was determined via Fourier analysis of small radiation fields and profiles of typical SRS treatment plans. The clinical impact of MLC errors of 0.5, 1, and 2 mm was evaluated. Global gamma (low‐dose threshold 10%) was evaluated for the three detector systems using various combinations of the distance to agreement and the dose difference. Results While MLC errors only slightly affected mean dose to PTV and a 2 mm thick surrounding structure (PTV_2 mm), significant PTV underdose incurred with increase in maximum dose to PTV_2 mm. Gamma indices with highest sensitivity to the introduced errors at 95% tolerance level for plans on target volumes of 3.2 cm3 (plan 3 cc) and 35.02 cm3 (plan 35 cc) were 2%/1 mm for the SRS MapCHECK and 2%/3 mm for the ArcCHECK, with 3%/1 mm (plan 3cc) and 2%/1 mm (plan 35cc) for the EPID. Drops in passing rates for a 2 mm MLC error were (46.2%, 41.6%) for the SRS MapCHECK and (12.2%, 4.2%) for the ArcCHECK for plan 3cc and plan 35cc, respectively. For Portal Dose, values were 4.5% (plan 3cc) and 7% (plan 35cc). The Nyquist frequency of two SRS dose distributions lie between 0.26  and 0.1 mm−1, corresponding to detector spacings of 1.9 and 5 mm. Evaluation of SRS MapCHECK data with doubled detector density indicates that increased detector density may reduce the system's sensitivity to errors, necessitating a tighter gamma index. Conclusions The present results give insight on the performance of detector arrays and gamma indices for the investigated detectors during SRS QA.