The use of multidose vials and fingerstick blood sampling devices in Korean emergency departments and intensive care units

Kwak YG, Lee S‐O, Kim TH, Choo EJ, Jeon M‐H, Jun J‐B, Kim K‐M, Jeong JS, Kim YS. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2012; 18: 77–83 The use of multidose vials and fingerstick blood sampling devices in Korean emergency departments and intensive care units This study was performed to compare co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of nursing practice Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 77 - 83
Main Authors Kwak, Yee Gyung, Lee, Sang-Oh, Kim, Tae Hyong, Choo, Eun Ju, Jeon, Min-Hyok, Jun, Jae-Bum, Kim, Kyung-Mi, Jeong, Jae Sim, Kim, Yang Soo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Publishing Asia 01.02.2012
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Kwak YG, Lee S‐O, Kim TH, Choo EJ, Jeon M‐H, Jun J‐B, Kim K‐M, Jeong JS, Kim YS. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2012; 18: 77–83 The use of multidose vials and fingerstick blood sampling devices in Korean emergency departments and intensive care units This study was performed to compare compliance with standard precautions for the use of multidose vials (MDVs) and fingerstick devices in emergency departments (EDs) and intensive care units (ICUs). Between December 2007 and February 2008, 389 nurses from the EDs or ICUs of six university‐affiliated hospitals in Korea were asked to complete the questionnaire. A total of 338 (86.9%) nurses completed the survey, corresponding to 159 of 184 ED and 179 of 205 ICU nurses. A comparison of MDV use in EDs and ICUs indicated a significant difference only in disinfection of the rubber septum of heparin vials; 88.1% of ED nurses and 96.6% of ICU nurses stated that they always disinfected the rubber septum of heparin vials whenever drawing medication (P = 0.003). The use of separate fingerstick devices for each patient (71.7% vs. 54.5%) and disinfection of these devices after each use (36.5% vs. 26.0%) were more common in ED nurses. The rate of good hand hygiene was lower in ED nurses, both before (43.7% vs. 74.3%) and after (64.6% vs. 91.6%) the use of fingerstick devices (P < 0.001 for both). There is a need to improve compliance with standard precautions, especially hand hygiene, in EDs.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-S564VSPJ-P
istex:949D7F74C516E79F380F6637DA0A4D4710455A72
ArticleID:IJN1994
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1322-7114
1440-172X
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2011.01994.x