Identifying Multiple Risks of Low Birth Weight Using Person-Centered Modeling

• Published in: Women's health issues Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. e251 - e256
• Main Authors: Hendryx, Michael, PhD, Luo, Juhua, PhD, Knox, Sarah S., PhD, Zullig, Keith J., PhD, Cottrell, Lesley, PhD, Hamilton, Candice W., MPH, John, Collin C., MD, MPH, Mullett, Martha D., MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2014
• Subjects: Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug abuse; Female; Health Behavior; Humans; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Low birth weight; Marital Status; Maternal Age; Medicaid; Obstetrics and Gynecology; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology; Prenatal Care; Risk Factors; Smoking; Smoking - adverse effects; Smoking - epidemiology; Socioeconomic Factors; Stress; United States; West Virginia; Women; West Virginia; United States; USA, West Virginia
• ISSN: 1049-3867; 1878-4321
• DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.01.001

Abstract Objectives Low birth weight outcomes result from multiple potential risks. The present study used latent class analysis to identify subgroups of women with multiple co-occurring risks and to examine the relationship of these risk classes to low birth weight outcome. Methods Data were analyzed on all live singleton births in 2010 and 2011 in West Virginia (N = 28,820). Ten risks were examined including marital status, stress, mother's age, parity status, reported smoking and drug use during pregnancy, delayed prenatal care, Medicaid coverage, uninsurance, and low education. Results Six latent classes were identified that ranged from a low-risk referent group to higher risk classes characterized by unique constellations of risk factors. Compared with the low-risk referent, all of the remaining five latent classes were significantly associated with increased odds of low birth weight. However, one class was at especially high risk; this class was characterized by unmarried women in the Medicaid program who reported drug use, smoking, stress, and late prenatal care (odds ratio, 4.78; 95% confidence interval, 4.07–5.61). Conclusions The person-centered approach identified subgroups of women with unique risk profiles. The results suggest that eliminating a single risk would not resolve the low birth weight problem. Smoking, for example, co-occurs with higher stress and higher levels of drug use among a Medicaid population. It may be beneficial to develop and test tailored interventions to groups with specific co-occurring risks to reduce low birth weight outcomes. Programs targeted to women in the Medicaid program who also engage in substance use and experience stress are especially indicated.