Clinical utility of circulating tumour cell-based monitoring of late-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: the randomised CirCe01 trial

Background CirCe01 trial aimed to assess the clinical utility of circulating tumour cell (CTC)-based monitoring in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients beyond the third line of chemotherapy (LC). Methods CirCe01 was a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial (NCT01349842) that included patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of cancer Vol. 124; no. 7; pp. 1207 - 1213
Main Authors Cabel, Luc, Berger, Frédérique, Cottu, Paul, Loirat, Delphine, Rampanou, Aurore, Brain, Etienne, Cyrille, Stacy, Bourgeois, Hugues, Kiavue, Nicolas, Deluche, Elise, Ladoire, Sylvain, Campone, Mario, Pierga, Jean-Yves, Bidard, Francois-Clement
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 30.03.2021
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background CirCe01 trial aimed to assess the clinical utility of circulating tumour cell (CTC)-based monitoring in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients beyond the third line of chemotherapy (LC). Methods CirCe01 was a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial (NCT01349842) that included patients with MBC after two systemic LC. Patients with ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL (CellSearch®) were randomised between the CTC-driven and the standard arm. In the CTC arm, changes in CTC count were assessed at the first cycle of each LC; patients in whom CTC levels predicted early tumour progression had to switch to a subsequent LC. Results Greater than or equal to 5 CTC/7.5 mL were observed in N  = 101/204 patients. In the CTC arm ( N  = 51), 43 (83%) and 18 (44%) patients completed CTC monitoring in the third and fourth lines, respectively, and 18 (42%) and 11 (61%) of these patients, respectively, had no CTC response. Thirteen (72%) and 5 (46%) of these patients underwent early switch to the next LC. Overall survival was not different between the two arms (hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval = [0.6;1.4], p  = 0.8). In subgroup analyses, patients with no CTC response who switched chemotherapy experienced longer survival than patients who did not. Conclusions Due to the limited accrual and compliance, this trial failed to demonstrate the clinical utility of CTC monitoring. Clinical Trial Registration NCT, NCT01349842, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01349842 , registered 9 May 2011.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/s41416-020-01227-3