Relating Fresh Concrete Viscosity Measurements from Different Rheometers

Concrete rheological properties need to be properly measured and predicted in order to characterize the workability of fresh concrete, including special concretes such as self-consolidating concrete (SCC). It was shown by a round-robin test held in 2000 [1,2] that different rheometer designs gave di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Vol. 108; no. 3; pp. 229 - 234
Main Authors Ferraris, Chiara F, Martys, Nicos S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Institute of Standards and Technology 01.05.2003
Superintendent of Documents
[Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Concrete rheological properties need to be properly measured and predicted in order to characterize the workability of fresh concrete, including special concretes such as self-consolidating concrete (SCC). It was shown by a round-robin test held in 2000 [1,2] that different rheometer designs gave different values of viscosity for the same concrete. While empirical correlation between different rheometers was possible, for a procedure that is supposed to "scientifically" improve on the empirical slump tests, this situation is unsatisfactory. To remedy this situation, a new interpretation of the data was developed. In this paper, it is shown that all instruments tested could be directly and quantitatively compared in terms of relative plastic viscosity instead of the plastic viscosity alone. This should eventually allow the measurements from various rheometer designs to be directly calibrated against known standards of plastic viscosity, putting concrete rheometry and concrete workability on a sounder materials science basis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1044-677X
2165-7254
DOI:10.6028/jres.108.021