Does active learning benefit spatial memory during navigation with restricted peripheral field?

• Published in: Attention, perception & psychophysics Vol. 82; no. 6; pp. 3033 - 3047
• Main Authors: Barhorst-Cates, Erica M., Rand, Kristina M., Creem-Regehr, Sarah H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.08.2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Active learning; Animal memory; Assistive Technology; Attention; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Blindness; Cognitive Psychology; Computer Simulation; Experiments; Eye Movements; Humans; Memorization; Memory; Mobility; Navigation; Problem-Based Learning; Psychology; Spatial Learning; Spatial Memory; Spatial Navigation; Visual impairment; Visual Impairments; Walking; Wheelchairs; Active and passive; Locomotion; Peripheral field loss; Navigation; Visual search
• ISSN: 1943-3921; 1943-393X; 1943-393X
• DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02038-7

Spatial learning of real-world environments is impaired with severely restricted peripheral field of view (FOV). In prior research, the effects of restricted FOV on spatial learning have been studied using passive learning paradigms – learners walk along pre-defined paths and are told the location of targets to be remembered. Our research has shown that mobility demands and environmental complexity may contribute to impaired spatial learning with restricted FOV through attentional mechanisms. Here, we examine the role of active navigation, both in locomotion and in target search. First, we compared effects of active versus passive locomotion (walking with a physical guide versus being pushed in a wheelchair) on a task of pointing to remembered targets in participants with simulated 10° FOV. We found similar performance between active and passive locomotion conditions in both simpler (Experiment 1 ) and more complex (Experiment 2 ) spatial learning tasks. Experiment 3 required active search for named targets to remember while navigating, using both a mild and a severe FOV restriction. We observed no difference in pointing accuracy between the two FOV restrictions but an increase in attentional demands with severely restricted FOV. Experiment 4 compared active and passive search with severe FOV restriction, within subjects. We found no difference in pointing accuracy, but observed an increase in cognitive load in active versus passive search. Taken together, in the context of navigating with restricted FOV, neither locomotion method nor level of active search affected spatial learning. However, the greater cognitive demands could have counteracted the potential advantage of the active learning conditions.