Artificial insemination in domestic cats ( Felis catus)

• Published in: Theriogenology Vol. 66; no. 1; pp. 122 - 125
• Main Author: Tsutsui, Toshihiko
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2006
• Subjects: Animals; Artificial insemination; Cat; Cats; conception; cryopreservation; Cryopreservation - veterinary; Deposition site; Fallopian Tubes; Female; Insemination, Artificial - methods; Insemination, Artificial - veterinary; intrauterine insemination; Male; oviducts; Semen; Semen Preservation - methods; Semen Preservation - veterinary; thawing; Uterus; Vagina; Deposition site; Semen; Artificial insemination; Cat
• ISSN: 0093-691X; 1879-3231
• DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.03.015

Artificial insemination (AI) in cats represents an important technique for increasing the contribution of genetically valuable individuals in specific populations, whether they be highly pedigreed purebred cats, medically important laboratory cats or endangered non-domestic cats. Semen is collected using electrical stimulation, with an artificial vagina or from intact or excised cauda epididymis. Sperm samples can be used for AI immediately after collection, after temporary storage above 0 °C or after cryopreservation. There have been three and five reports on intravaginal and intrauterine insemination, respectively, and one report on tubal insemination with fresh semen. In studies using fresh semen, it was reported that conception rates of 50% or higher were obtained by intravaginal insemination with 10–50 × 10 6 spermatozoa, while, in another report, the conception rate was 78% after AI with 80 × 10 6 spermatozoa. After intrauterine insemination, conception rates following deposition of 6.2 × 10 6 and 8 × 10 6 spermatozoa were reported to be 50 and 80%, respectively. With tubal insemination, the conception rate was 43% when 4 × 10 6 spermatozoa were used, showing that the number of spermatozoa required to obtain a satisfactory conception rate was similar to that of cats inseminated directly into the uterus. When frozen semen was used for intravaginal insemination the conception rate was rather low, but intrauterine insemination with 50 × 10 6 frozen/thawed spermatozoa resulted in a conception rate of 57%. Furthermore, in one report, conception was obtained by intrauterine insemination of frozen epididymal spermatozoa. Overall, there have been few reports on artificial insemination in cats. The results obtained to date show considerable variation, both within and among laboratories depending upon the type and number of spermatozoa used and the site of sperm deposition. Undoubtedly, future studies will identify the major factors required to consistently obtain reliable conception rates, so that AI can become a practical technique for enhancing the production of desirable genotypes, both for laboratory and conservation purposes.