A guide for urogynecologic patient care utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: review of existing evidence

• Published in: International Urogynecology Journal Vol. 31; no. 6; pp. 1063 - 1089
• Main Authors: Grimes, Cara L., Balk, Ethan M., Crisp, Catrina C., Antosh, Danielle D., Murphy, Miles, Halder, Gabriela E., Jeppson, Peter C., Weber LeBrun, Emily E., Raman, Sonali, Kim-Fine, Shunaha, Iglesia, Cheryl, Dieter, Alexis A., Yurteri-Kaplan, Ladin, Adam, Gaelen, Meriwether, Kate V.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.06.2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Betacoronavirus; Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology; Coronavirus Infections - prevention & control; Coronavirus Infections - virology; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Disease transmission; Fecal incontinence; Female; Female Urogenital Diseases - therapy; Female Urogenital Diseases - virology; Gynecology; Gynecology - methods; Humans; Infection Control - methods; Literature reviews; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original; Original Article; Pandemics; Pandemics - prevention & control; Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology; Pneumonia, Viral - prevention & control; Pneumonia, Viral - virology; SARS-CoV-2; Telemedicine; Telemedicine - methods; Urology; COVID-19; Virtual visit; Telemedicine; Systematic review; Pandemic; FPMRS; Urogynecology
• ISSN: 0937-3462; 1433-3023
• DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04314-4

Introduction and hypothesis The COVID-19 pandemic and the desire to “flatten the curve” of transmission have significantly affected the way providers care for patients. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgeons (FPMRS) must provide high quality of care through remote access such as telemedicine. No clear guidelines exist on the use of telemedicine in FPMRS. Using expedited literature review methodology, we provide guidance regarding management of common outpatient urogynecology scenarios during the pandemic. Methods We grouped FPMRS conditions into those in which virtual management differs from direct in-person visits and conditions in which treatment would emphasize behavioral and conservative counseling but not deviate from current management paradigms. We conducted expedited literature review on four topics (telemedicine in FPMRS, pessary management, urinary tract infections, urinary retention) and addressed four other topics (urinary incontinence, prolapse, fecal incontinence, defecatory dysfunction) based on existing systematic reviews and guidelines. We further compiled expert consensus regarding management of FPMRS patients in the virtual setting, scenarios when in-person visits are necessary, symptoms that should alert providers, and specific considerations for FPMRS patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Results Behavioral, medical, and conservative management will be valuable as first-line virtual treatments. Certain situations will require different treatments in the virtual setting while others will require an in-person visit despite the risks of COVID-19 transmission. Conclusions We have presented guidance for treating FPMRS conditions via telemedicine based on rapid literature review and expert consensus and presented it in a format that can be actively referenced.