The utility of prostate MRI within active surveillance: description of the evidence

• Published in: World journal of urology Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 71 - 77
• Main Authors: Dominique, Georgina, Brisbane, Wayne G., Reiter, Robert E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.01.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biopsy; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nephrology; NMR; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Oncology; Predictive Value of Tests; Prostate cancer; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy; Reclassification; Surveillance; Topic Paper; Urology; Watchful Waiting; Active surveillance; MRI; Prostate cancer; PI-RADS
• ISSN: 0724-4983; 1433-8726
• DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03853-9

Purpose We present an overview of the literature regarding the use of MRI in active surveillance of prostate cancer. Methods Both MEDLINE ® and Cochrane Library were queried up to May 2020 for studies of men on active surveillance with MRI and later confirmatory biopsy. The terms studied were ‘prostate cancer’ as the anchor followed by two of the following: active surveillance, surveillance, active monitoring, MRI, NMR, magnetic resonance imaging,  MRI, and multiparametric MRI. Studies were excluded if pathologic reclassification (GG1 →  ≥ GG2) and PI-RADS or equivalent was not reported. Results Within active surveillance, baseline MRI is effective for identifying clinically significant prostate cancer and thus associated with fewer reclassification events. A positive initial MRI (≥ PI-RADS 3) with GG1 identified at biopsy has a positive predictive value (PPV) of 35–40% for reclassification by 3 years. MRI possessed a stronger negative predictive value, with a negative MRI (≤ PI-RADS 2) yielding a negative predictive value of up to 85% at 3 years. Surveillance MRI, obtained after initial biopsy, yielded a PPV of 11–65% and NPV of 85–95% for reclassification. Conclusion MRI is useful for initial risk stratification of prostate cancer in men on active surveillance, especially if MRI is negative when imaging is obtained during surveillance. While useful, MRI cannot replace biopsy and further research is necessary to fully integrate MRI into active surveillance.