Spider Mites Cause More Damage to Tomato in the Dark When Induced Defenses Are Lower

• Published in: Journal of chemical ecology Vol. 46; no. 7; pp. 631 - 641
• Main Authors: Liu, Jie, Chafi, Rachid, Legarrea, Saioa, Alba, Juan M., Meijer, Tomas, Menken, Steph B. J., Kant, Merijn R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.07.2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Agriculture; Animals; Biochemistry; Biological Microscopy; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Cyclopentanes - metabolism; Damage; Darkness; Diurnal variations; Ecology; Entomology; Feeding; Feeding Behavior; Female; Gene Expression; Genes; Herbivory; Jasmonic acid; Life Sciences; Markers; Mites; Night; Oxylipins - metabolism; Plant Immunity - genetics; Plant Leaves - metabolism; Salicylic acid; Salicylic Acid - metabolism; Solanum lycopersicum - genetics; Solanum lycopersicum - immunology; Solanum lycopersicum - physiology; Species Specificity; Tetranychidae - physiology; Time Factors; Tomatoes; Salicylate; Jasmonate; Plant defense; Diurnal; Effector; Herbivore
• ISSN: 0098-0331; 1573-1561
• DOI: 10.1007/s10886-020-01195-1

Plants have evolved robust mechanisms to cope with incidental variation (e.g. herbivory) and periodical variation (e.g. light/darkness during the day-night cycle) in their environment. It has been shown that a plant’s susceptibility to pathogens can vary during its day-night cycle. We demonstrated earlier that the spider mite Tetranychus urticae induces jasmonate- and salicylate-mediated defenses in tomato plants while the spider mite T. evansi suppresses these defenses probably by secreting salivary effector proteins. Here we compared induction/suppression of plant defenses; the expression of mite-effector genes and the amount of damage due to mite feeding during the day and during the night. T. urticae feeding upregulated the expression of jasmonate and salicylate marker-genes albeit significantly higher under light than under darkness. Some of these marker-genes were also upregulated by T. evansi -feeding albeit to much lower levels than by T. urticae -feeding. The expression of effector 28 was not affected by light or darkness in either mite species. However, the expression of effector 84 was considerably higher under light, especially for T. evansi . Finally, while T. evansi produced overall more feeding damage than T. urticae both mites produced consistently more damage during the dark phase than under light. Our results suggest that induced defenses are subject to diurnal variation possibly causing tomatoes to incur more damage due to mite-feeding during the dark phase. We speculate that mites, but especially T. evansi , may relax effector production during the dark phase because under these conditions the plant’s ability to upregulate defenses is reduced.