Improving live weight gain of crossbred Limousin bulls with cassava peel silage

• Published in: Animal (Cambridge, England) Vol. 16; no. 5; p. 100524
• Main Authors: Kusmartono, Retnaningrum, S., Mashudi, Harper, K.J., Poppi, D.P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier B.V 01.05.2022; Elsevier
• Subjects: Animal Feed - analysis; Animals; Cattle; Diet - veterinary; Digestion; DM intake; Feed conversion ratio; Maize stover; Male; Manihot; Protein meals; Ration formulation; Rumen - metabolism; Silage - analysis; Urea - metabolism; Weight Gain; Zea mays - metabolism; Maize stover; Ration formulation; Protein meals; DM intake; Feed conversion ratio
• ISSN: 1751-7311; 1751-732X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100524

•Cassava peel silage was incorporated into cattle rations to evaluate live weight gain.•Cassava peel silage is safe to feed to cattle.•Up to 60% inclusion of cassava peel silage maximised cattle live weight gain.•Using cassava peel in rations reduces factory waste and improves smallholder income.•Formulating least-cost rations is an important strategy to meet the demand for beef. There is a growing demand for beef products across developing countries. Formulating rations to include locally available waste products has the potential to increase the live weight gain (LWG) of cattle and improve the livelihoods of smallholder farmers; however, upper limit inclusion levels of cassava peel products require investigation. An experiment evaluated the effect of using cassava peel silage (CPS) at the DM inclusion levels of 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70% (with the remainder protein meals and maize stover in the diet) on the LWG of crossbred Limousin × Ongole bulls (269 ± 48.8 kg). Thirty bulls, approximately two years of age, were allocated in a completely randomised block design with six blocks based on initial live weight (LW) and five treatments based on level of CPS. The combination of CPS (with 2% urea of the CPS) and protein meals significantly affected LWG with the highest values obtained at levels of 30 and 50% inclusion of CPS (1.16–1.35 kg/day) (P < 0.05). Polynomial analysis of LWG data revealed the optimal LWG is theoretically achieved at 37% CPS with a LWG of 1.31 kg/day; however, LWG was similar from 30 to 50% inclusion levels and then declined. There was little significant difference at CPS inclusion levels of 30–60%, for DM intake (DMI) which ranged from 2.3 to 2.6% LW, organic matter (OM) digestibility (77.8–81.6%), feed conversion ratio (FCR) (6.56–7.56 kg DM/kg LWG) and feed cost of gain (Indonesia rupiah (IDR)/kg LW 18 612 – 21 398). At a high (70%) level of CPS inclusion, these values were markedly changed when compared to the 30% inclusion level of CPS. Feed treatments did not affect rumen pH, NH3-N, concentration or molar percentage of volatile fatty acids or protozoal population (P < 0.05). Rumen pH measured three hours after morning feed ranged from 6.7 to 6.8 and NH3-N ranged from 14.1 to 19.3 mg NH3-N/dl. It was concluded that inclusion of CPS up to 60% mixed with protein meals and urea and 20% maize stover maximised LWG and profitability of the production system.