Genetic and environmental contributions to social anxiety across different ages: A meta-analytic approach to twin data

•Estimates of genetic and environmental influences vary widely for social anxiety.•We calculated meta-analytic estimations of aetiological influences.•Genetic and non-shared environmental factors explain most of the individual differences.•Shared environmental factors seem to be less relevant.•Resul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of anxiety disorders Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 650 - 656
Main Authors Scaini, Simona, Belotti, Raffaella, Ogliari, Anna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Estimates of genetic and environmental influences vary widely for social anxiety.•We calculated meta-analytic estimations of aetiological influences.•Genetic and non-shared environmental factors explain most of the individual differences.•Shared environmental factors seem to be less relevant.•Results support intervention protocols for social anxiety. Social anxiety disorder (SAD) and social anxiety symptoms (SAS) have been largely studied both epidemiologically and genetically, however, estimates of genetic and environmental influences for these phenotypes widely vary across reports. Based upon available literature, 13 cohorts (42,585 subjects) were included in 3 meta-analytic estimates of the standardized variance components of aetiological influences on SAD/SAS, on the effect of age and of phenotype (symptoms vs. diagnosis). The proportions of variance accounted for by genetic and environmental factors were calculated by averaging estimates among studies, and pondered by the number of individuals in each sample. Meta-analytic estimations showed that genetic and non-shared environmental factors explain most of individual differences for SAD/SAS. In adults, the genetic contribution was half than that in younger patients, with higher contribution of non-shared environmental influences. In contrast, the shared environmental factors seem to be less relevant.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0887-6185
1873-7897
1873-7897
DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.07.002