Prioritization of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the surface waters of Korea: Application of an optimized risk-based methods

• Published in: Ecotoxicology and environmental safety Vol. 259; p. 115024
• Main Authors: Kim, Jun Yub, Jeon, Junho, Kim, Sang Don
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.07.2023; Elsevier
• Subjects: Ecological risk assessment; LC-HRMS/MS; Personal care products; Pharmaceuticals; Prioritization; Prioritization; Personal care products; LC-HRMS/MS; Pharmaceuticals; Ecological risk assessment
• ISSN: 0147-6513; 1090-2414
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115024

The occurrence of PPCPs in aquatic environments and their potential adverse effects on aquatic organisms have raised worldwide concerns. To address this issue, a study was conducted to analyze 137 selected PPCPs in Korean surface waters, and an optimized risk-based prioritization was performed. The results revealed that 120 PPCPs were detected, with 98 quantified at concentrations ranging from few ng/L to 42,733 ng/L for metformin. The 95% upper confidence limit (UCL95) of the mean value of the measured environmental concentration (MEC) for Metformin was about eight times higher than the second highest compound, dimethyl phthalate, indicating that antidiabetic groups had the highest concentration among the therapeutic groups. An optimized risk-based prioritization was then assessed based on the multiplication of two indicators, the Frequency of Exceedance and the Extent of Exceedance of Predicted No-Effect Concentrations (PNECs), which can be calculated using the traditional risk quotient (RQ) approach. The study found that clotrimazole had the highest risk quotient value of 17.4, indicating a high risk to aquatic organisms, with seven and 13 compounds showing RQ values above 1 and 0.1, respectively. After considering the frequency of exceedance, clotrimazole still had the highest novel risk quotient (RQf) value of 17.4, with 99.6% of its MECs exceeding PNECs. However, the number of compounds with RQf values above 1 decreased from seven to five, with cetirizine and flubendazole being excluded. Furthermore, only 10 compounds exhibited RQf values above 0.1. The study also observed significant differences in the results between risk-based and exposure-based prioritization methods, with only five compounds, cetirizine, olmesartan, climbazole, sulfapyridine, and imidacloprid, identified in both methods. This finding highlights the importance of considering multiple methods for prioritizing chemicals, as different approaches may yield different results. [Display omitted] •120 PPCPs were detected at concentrations ranging from few ng/L to µg/L.•Metformin had highest concentration, up to 42,733 ng/L.•Clotrimazole was prioritized first due to their high RQ, F, and RQf values.•Six PPCPs were prioritized as posing moderate to high risk in Korean surface water.•Differences in prioritization approaches highlight the need for multiple methods.