An Improved Method to Measure the Cosmic Curvature

In this paper, we propose an improved model-independent method to constrain the cosmic curvature by combining the most recent Hubble parameter H(z) and supernovae Ia (SNe Ia) data. Based on the H(z) data, we first use the model-independent smoothing technique, Gaussian processes, to construct a dist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Astrophysical journal Vol. 838; no. 2; pp. 160 - 168
Main Authors Wei, Jun-Jie, Wu, Xue-Feng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia The American Astronomical Society 01.04.2017
IOP Publishing
Subjects
Astrophysics
ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
Confidence intervals
cosmological parameters
COSMOLOGY
cosmology: observations
Curvature
Curve fitting
DATA
GALAXIES
galaxies: general
Gaussian process
GAUSSIAN PROCESSES
Hubble constant
LIMITING VALUES
Mathematical models
Parameter estimation
SUPERNOVAE
supernovae: general
UNIVERSE
VISIBLE RADIATION
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this paper, we propose an improved model-independent method to constrain the cosmic curvature by combining the most recent Hubble parameter H(z) and supernovae Ia (SNe Ia) data. Based on the H(z) data, we first use the model-independent smoothing technique, Gaussian processes, to construct a distance modulus H(z), which is susceptible to the cosmic curvature parameter k. In contrary to previous studies, the light-curve-fitting parameters, which account for the distance estimation of SN ( SN(z)), are set free to investigate whether k has a dependence on them. By comparing H(z) to SN(z), we put limits on k. Our results confirm that k is independent of the SN light-curve parameters. Moreover, we show that the measured k is in good agreement with zero cosmic curvature, implying that there is no significant deviation from a flat universe at the current observational data level. We also test the influence of different H(z) samples and different Hubble constant H0 values, finding that different H(z) samples do not have a significant impact on the constraints. However, different H0 priors can affect the constraints of k to some degree. The prior of H0 = 73.24 1.74 km s−1 Mpc−1 gives a value of k, a little bit above the 1 confidence level away from 0, but H0 = 69.6 0.7 km s−1 Mpc−1 gives it below 1 .
Bibliography:Galaxies and Cosmology
AAS01693
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/aa674b