Assessing spatial predictive models in the environmental sciences: Accuracy measures, data variation and variance explained

A comprehensive assessment of the performance of predictive models is necessary as they have been increasingly employed to generate spatial predictions for environmental management and conservation and their accuracy is crucial to evidence-informed decision making and policy. In this study, we clari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental modelling & software : with environment data news Vol. 80; pp. 1 - 8
Main Author Li, Jin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A comprehensive assessment of the performance of predictive models is necessary as they have been increasingly employed to generate spatial predictions for environmental management and conservation and their accuracy is crucial to evidence-informed decision making and policy. In this study, we clarified relevant issues associated with variance explained (VEcv) by predictive models, established the relationships between VEcv and commonly used accuracy measures and unified these measures under VEcv that is independent of unit/scale and data variation. We quantified the relationships between these measures and data variation and found about 65% compared models and over 45% recommended models for generating spatial predictions explained no more than 50% data variance. We classified the predictive models based on VEcv, which provides a tool to directly compare the accuracy of predictive models for data with different unit/scale and variation and establishes a cross-disciplinary context and benchmark for assessing predictive models in future studies. •Established the relationships of VECV with commonly used accuracy measures.•Quantified the relationships of these measures with data variation.•Objectively assessed predictive models based on VECV in the environmental sciences.•Provided a tool to assess predictive models for data of various unit and variation.•Established a cross-disciplinary context/benchmark for assessing predictive models.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1364-8152
DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.004