An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer

Cancers adapt to increasingly potent targeted therapies by reprogramming their phenotype. Here we investigated such a phenomenon in prostate cancer, in which tumours can escape epithelial lineage confinement and transition to a high-plasticity state as an adaptive response to potent androgen recepto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature cell biology Vol. 23; no. 9; pp. 1023 - 1034
Main Authors Davies, Alastair, Nouruzi, Shaghayegh, Ganguli, Dwaipayan, Namekawa, Takeshi, Thaper, Daksh, Linder, Simon, Karaoğlanoğlu, Fatih, Omur, Meltem E., Kim, Soojin, Kobelev, Maxim, Kumar, Sahil, Sivak, Olena, Bostock, Chiara, Bishop, Jennifer, Hoogstraat, Marlous, Talal, Amina, Stelloo, Suzan, van der Poel, Henk, Bergman, Andries M., Ahmed, Musaddeque, Fazli, Ladan, Huang, Haojie, Tilley, Wayne, Goodrich, David, Feng, Felix Y., Gleave, Martin, He, Housheng Hansen, Hach, Faraz, Zwart, Wilbert, Beltran, Himisha, Selth, Luke, Zoubeidi, Amina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.09.2021
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cancers adapt to increasingly potent targeted therapies by reprogramming their phenotype. Here we investigated such a phenomenon in prostate cancer, in which tumours can escape epithelial lineage confinement and transition to a high-plasticity state as an adaptive response to potent androgen receptor (AR) antagonism. We found that AR activity can be maintained as tumours adopt alternative lineage identities, with changes in chromatin architecture guiding AR transcriptional rerouting. The epigenetic regulator enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) co-occupies the reprogrammed AR cistrome to transcriptionally modulate stem cell and neuronal gene networks—granting privileges associated with both fates. This function of EZH2 was associated with T350 phosphorylation and establishment of a non-canonical polycomb subcomplex. Our study provides mechanistic insights into the plasticity of the lineage-infidelity state governed by AR reprogramming that enabled us to redirect cell fate by modulating EZH2 and AR, highlighting the clinical potential of reversing resistance phenotypes. Davies et al. demonstrate that androgen receptor–targeted therapy induces lineage-plastic transcriptional reprogramming, which is mediated by EZH2 and favours stem cell and neuronal gene networks in treatment-resistant prostate cancer.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
A.D. and A.Z. conceptualized and designed the study. S.N., T.N. and A.T generated cell lines and performed functionalization experiments. D. Ganguli, F.K., M.A., F.H. and H.H.H. performed peak calling, quality control and visualization for ChIP-seq and/or ATAC-seq. T.N., D.T. and M.K performed RIME and ChIP experiments. S. Kim and C.B. characterized cell lines. S. Kumar performed PLA. O.S. and J.B. generated xenografts. M.E.O. analysed RIME. S.L., M.H., S.S., H.v.d.P., A.M.B. and W.Z. procured and/or analysed clinical specimens from the DARANA trial. L.F. reviewed pathology and scored all immunohistochemistry staining. H.H. provided the pEZH2-T350 antibody and EZH2 T350 mutant constructs for initial exploratory studies. D. Goodrich shared GEMMs. M.G. and H.B. provided access to clinical specimens. D. Goodrich, W.T. and F.Y.F. reviewed the manuscript. L.S. and A.Z. edited the manuscript. A.D. performed all other experiments, generated figures, and wrote the manuscript. All authors provided intellectual input and vetted and approved the final manuscript.
Author contributions
ISSN:1465-7392
1476-4679
DOI:10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5