Experiences Receiving HIV-Positive Results by Phone: Acceptability and Implications for Clinical and Behavioral Research

• Published in: AIDS and behavior Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 709 - 720
• Main Authors: D’Angelo, Alexa B., Morrison, Corey A., Lopez-Rios, Javier, MacCrate, Caitlin J., Pantalone, David W., Stief, Matthew, Grov, Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.03.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Acceptability; Adult; Behavioral Research; Counseling; Disease transmission; Emotional support; Emotions; Gays & lesbians; Health Psychology; HIV; HIV Infections - diagnosis; HIV Infections - prevention & control; Homosexuality, Male - psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humans; Infectious Diseases; Interviews; Male; Medical tests; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Men who have sex with men; Mens health; Original Paper; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology; Patient satisfaction; Public Health; Qualitative Research; Sexually transmitted diseases; STD; Telemedicine; Telemedicine - statistics & numerical data; Telephone communications; Telephones; Qualitative research; HIV testing; HIV; Telemedicine; MSM
• ISSN: 1090-7165; 1573-3254; 1573-3254
• DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-03027-5

Improving HIV testing rates and increasing early detection among men who have sex with men (MSM) are critical strategies for enhancing overall health and decreasing HIV transmission. Remote testing and phone delivery of HIV test results may reduce barriers such as geographic isolation or HIV-related stigma. In 2018–19, 50 MSM completed qualitative interviews about their experience receiving a positive HIV test result via phone through their participation in a research study that included remote HIV testing. Interview topics included the acceptability of, and concerns about, phone delivery of HIV results, as well as suggestions for improvement. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analysed using an inductive thematic approach. Overall, participants reported high acceptability of phone delivery of HIV-positive results. Participants praised the support and information provided by study staff. Benefits identified included increased convenience compared to in-person medical visits, allowing participants to emotionally process their test results privately, as well as receiving the results from supportive and responsive staff members. A few participants indicated drawbacks to phone-based HIV test result delivery, such as logistical concerns about receiving a phone call during the day (e.g., while at work), reduced confidentiality, and the lack of in-person emotional support. Overall, participants described phone delivery of positive HIV-results as acceptable. At-home testing with phone delivery has the potential to increase HIV testing access, especially to geographically isolated or medically underserved patients.