Optimal bidding in auctions from a game theory perspective

•We review recent advances in auction theory from a game theoretic perspective.•We consider estimation issues and the effect of asymmetry on bidding.•We examine how auctions are embedded in the market.•We investigate bidding when players break the rules.•We expand the perspective by incorporating ir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of operational research Vol. 248; no. 2; pp. 347 - 371
Main Author Lorentziadis, Panos L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 16.01.2016
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We review recent advances in auction theory from a game theoretic perspective.•We consider estimation issues and the effect of asymmetry on bidding.•We examine how auctions are embedded in the market.•We investigate bidding when players break the rules.•We expand the perspective by incorporating irrationality in bidding. The game theoretic perspective in auction bidding has provided a powerful normative framework for the analysis of auctions and it has generated an impressive volume of research contributions. Tracing this research, we review key recent advances, which have greatly expanded our understanding of the operation of auctions and produced a more accurate analysis of mechanism design and optimal bidding. We follow various experimental studies which have shown that the predictive power of auction theory remains in many cases limited. For this reason, we concentrate on research themes, which enhance the applicability of auction theory leading to more realistic descriptions of bidding behaviors. We identify important innovations, which expand the environment of auction bidding and carry us beyond rational decision making. We conclude providing directions of future research and discussing their implications.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0377-2217
1872-6860
DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.012