Measuring body satisfaction in women with eating disorders and healthy women: appearance-related and functional components in the Body Cathexis Scale (Dutch version)

• Published in: Eating and weight disorders Vol. 26; no. 8; pp. 2665 - 2672
• Main Authors: Rekkers, Marlies E., Scheffers, Mia, van Busschbach, Jooske T., van Elburg, Annemarie A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.12.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adult; Anorexia; Body Image; Bulimia; Cathexis; Clinical medicine; Cross-Sectional Studies; Eating disorders; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Feeding and Eating Disorders - diagnosis; Female; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Obesity; Original; Original Article; Personal Satisfaction; Psychiatry; Psychometrics; Quantitative psychology; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; Self image; Surveys and Questionnaires; Body functionality; Eating disorder; Body image; Body appreciation; Body satisfaction
• ISSN: 1590-1262; 1124-4909; 1590-1262
• DOI: 10.1007/s40519-021-01120-9

Purpose Differentiating the concept of body satisfaction, especially the functional component, is important in clinical and research context. The aim of the present study is to contribute to further refinement of the concept by evaluating the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Body Cathexis Scale (BCS). Differences in body satisfaction between clinical and non-clinical respondents are also explored. Method Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to investigate whether functional body satisfaction can be distinguished as a separate factor, using data from 238 adult female patients from a clinical sample and 1060 women from two non-clinical samples in the Netherlands. Univariate tests were used to identify differences between non-clinical and clinical samples. Results EFA identified functionality as one of three factors, which was confirmed by CFA. CFA showed the best fit for a three-factor model, where functionality, non-weight, and weight were identified as separate factors in both populations. Internal consistency was good and correlations between factors were low. Women in the non-clinical sample scored significantly higher on the BCS than women with eating disorders on all three subscales, with high effect sizes. Conclusions The three factors of the BCS may be used as subscales, enabling researchers and practitioners to use one scale to measure different aspects of body satisfaction, including body functionality. Use of the BCS may help to achieve a more complete understanding of how people evaluate body satisfaction and contribute to further research on the effectiveness of interventions focussing on body functionality. Level of evidence Cross-sectional descriptive study, Level V.