Brain MRI Deep Learning and Bayesian Inference System Augments Radiology Resident Performance

Automated quantitative and probabilistic medical image analysis has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the radiology workflow. We sought to determine whether AI systems for brain MRI diagnosis could be used as a clinical decision support tool to augment radiologist performance....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of digital imaging Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 1049 - 1058
Main Authors Rudie, Jeffrey D., Duda, Jeffrey, Duong, Michael Tran, Chen, Po-Hao, Xie, Long, Kurtz, Robert, Ware, Jeffrey B., Choi, Joshua, Mattay, Raghav R., Botzolakis, Emmanuel J., Gee, James C., Bryan, R. Nick, Cook, Tessa S., Mohan, Suyash, Nasrallah, Ilya M., Rauschecker, Andreas M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.08.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Automated quantitative and probabilistic medical image analysis has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the radiology workflow. We sought to determine whether AI systems for brain MRI diagnosis could be used as a clinical decision support tool to augment radiologist performance. We utilized previously developed AI systems that combine convolutional neural networks and expert-derived Bayesian networks to distinguish among 50 diagnostic entities on multimodal brain MRIs. We tested whether these systems could augment radiologist performance through an interactive clinical decision support tool known as Adaptive Radiology Interpretation and Education System (ARIES) in 194 test cases. Four radiology residents and three academic neuroradiologists viewed half of the cases unassisted and half with the results of the AI system displayed on ARIES. Diagnostic accuracy of radiologists for top diagnosis (TDx) and top three differential diagnosis (T3DDx) was compared with and without ARIES. Radiology resident performance was significantly better with ARIES for both TDx (55% vs 30%; P  < .001) and T3DDx (79% vs 52%; P  = 0.002), with the largest improvement for rare diseases (39% increase for T3DDx; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between attending performance with and without ARIES for TDx (72% vs 69%; P  = 0.48) or T3DDx (86% vs 89%; P  = 0.39). These findings suggest that a hybrid deep learning and Bayesian inference clinical decision support system has the potential to augment diagnostic accuracy of non-specialists to approach the level of subspecialists for a large array of diseases on brain MRI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0897-1889
1618-727X
1618-727X
DOI:10.1007/s10278-021-00470-1