Improving perioperative pain management: a preintervention and postintervention study in 7 developing countries

• Published in: Pain reports Vol. 4; no. 1; p. e705
• Main Authors: Zaslansky, Ruth, Chapman, C Richard, Baumbach, Philipp, Bytyqi, Adem, Castro Lopes, José M, Chetty, Sean, Kopf, Andreas, Li, Li, Ern Ming, Lim, Olawoye, Olayinka, Rizza Parico, Jane, Soyannwo, Olaitan, Stamenkovic, Dusica, Wang, Hongwei, Meissner, Winfried
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wolters Kluwer 01.01.2019
• Subjects: Acute and Perioperative; Quality improvement; Pain; Perioperative pain management; Surgery
• ISSN: 2471-2531; 2471-2531
• DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000705

The burden of untreated postoperative pain is high. This study assessed feasibility of using quality improvement (QI) tools to improve management of perioperative pain in hospitals in multiple developing countries. The International Pain Registry and Developing Countries working groups, from the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), sponsored the project and PAIN OUT, a QI and research network, coordinated it, and provided the research tools. The IASP published a call about the project on its website. Principal investigators (PIs) were responsible for implementing a preintervention and postintervention study in 1 to 2 surgical wards in their hospitals, and they were free to choose the QI intervention. Trained surveyors used standardized and validated web-based tools for collecting findings about perioperative pain management and patient reported outcomes (PROs). Four processes and PROs, independent of surgery type, assessed effectiveness of the interventions. Forty-three providers responded to the call; 13 applications were selected; and PIs from 8 hospitals, in 14 wards, in 7 countries, completed the study. Interventions focused on teaching providers about pain management. Processes improved in 35% and PROs in 37.5% of wards. The project proved useful on multiple levels. It offered PIs a framework and tools to perform QI work and findings to present to colleagues and administration. Management practices and PROs improved on some wards. Interpretation of change proved complex, site-dependent, and related to multiple factors. PAIN OUT gained experience coordinating a multicentre, international QI project. The IASP promoted research, education, and QI work.