Development and validation of a risk prediction model for end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes

The aim of this study is to develop a prediction model for ESRD in patients with type 2 diabetes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, consisting of 24,104 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. We adopted the procedures proposed by the Framingham Heart Study to develop a prediction model for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 10177
Main Authors Lin, Cheng-Chieh, Li, Chia-Ing, Liu, Chiu-Shong, Lin, Wen-Yuan, Lin, Chih-Hsueh, Yang, Sing-Yu, Li, Tsai-Chung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 31.08.2017
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI10.1038/s41598-017-09243-9

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study is to develop a prediction model for ESRD in patients with type 2 diabetes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, consisting of 24,104 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. We adopted the procedures proposed by the Framingham Heart Study to develop a prediction model for ESRD. Participants were randomly assigned to the derivation and validation sets at a 2:1 ratio. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for model development. A total of 813 and 402 subjects (5.06% and 5.00%, respectively) developed ESRD in the derivation and validation sets over a mean follow-up period of 8.3 years. The risk-scoring systems included age, gender, age of diabetes onset, combined statuses of blood pressure and anti-hypertensive medication use, creatinine, variation in HbA1c, variation in systolic blood pressure, diabetes retinopathy, albuminuria, anti-diabetes medications, and combined statuses of hyperlipidemia and anti-hyperlipidemia medication use. The area under curves of 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year ESRD risks were 0.90, 0.86, and 0.81 in the derivation set, respectively. This risk score model can be used as screening for early prevention. The risk prediction for 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year period demonstrated good predictive accuracy and discriminatory ability.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-09243-9