Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature

• Published in: Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM Vol. 37; no. 16; pp. 4257 - 4267
• Main Authors: Hempel, Susanne, Bolshakova, Maria, Turner, Barbara J., Dinalo, Jennifer, Rose, Danielle, Motala, Aneesa, Fu, Ning, Clemesha, Chase G., Rubenstein, Lisa, Stockdale, Susan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.12.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Effectiveness; Health care; Humans; Initiatives; Internal Medicine; Literature reviews; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Primary care; Quality control; Quality Improvement; Review; evidence-based; quality improvement; scoping review
• ISSN: 0884-8734; 1525-1497
• DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5

Background Quality improvement (QI) initiatives often reflect approaches based on anecdotal evidence, but it is unclear how initiatives can best incorporate scientific literature and methods into the QI process. Review of studies of QI initiatives that aim to systematically incorporate evidence review (termed evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI)) may provide a basis for further methodological development. Methods In this scoping review (registration: https://osf.io/hr5bj ) of EBQI, we searched the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. The review addressed three central questions: How is EBQI defined? How is evidence used to inform evidence-informed QI initiatives? What is the effectiveness of EBQI? Results We identified 211 publications meeting inclusion criteria. In total, 170 publications explicitly used the term “EBQI.” Published definitions emphasized relying on evidence throughout the QI process. We reviewed a subset of 67 evaluations of QI initiatives in primary care, including both studies that used the term “EBQI” with those that described an evidence-based initiative without using EBQI terminology. The most frequently reported EBQI components included use of evidence to identify previously tested effective QI interventions; engaging stakeholders; iterative intervention development; partnering with frontline clinicians; and data-driven evaluation of the QI intervention. Effectiveness estimates were positive but varied in size in ten studies that provided data on patient health outcomes. Conclusions EBQI is a promising strategy for integrating relevant prior scientific findings and methods systematically in the QI process, from the initial developmental phase of the IQ initiative through to its evaluation. Future QI researchers and practitioners can use these findings as the basis for further development of QI initiatives.