A Phase I, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Single-Dose Trial of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Cannabidiol in Subjects with Mild to Severe Renal Impairment

Introduction As patients who receive cannabidiol (CBD) may have co-existing renal morbidities, it is important to understand whether dose adjustments are necessary to mitigate the risk of exposure-related toxicity. This study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical pharmacokinetics Vol. 59; no. 6; pp. 747 - 755
Main Authors Tayo, Bola, Taylor, Lesley, Sahebkar, Farhad, Morrison, Gilmour
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.06.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction As patients who receive cannabidiol (CBD) may have co-existing renal morbidities, it is important to understand whether dose adjustments are necessary to mitigate the risk of exposure-related toxicity. This study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of CBD in patients with renal impairment. Methods The pharmacokinetics and safety of a single oral 200 mg dose of a plant-derived pharmaceutical formulation of highly purified CBD in oral solution (Epidiolex ® in the USA; 100 mg/mL) were assessed in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment ( n  = 8/group) relative to matched subjects with normal renal function ( n  = 8). Blood samples were collected until 48 h post-dose and evaluated by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare primary pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum measured plasma concentration [ C max ], oral clearance of drug from plasma [CL/ F ], renal clearance [CL R ], area under the plasma concentration–time curve [AUC] from time zero to last measurable concentration [AUC t ], and AUC from time zero to infinity [AUC ∞ ]); descriptive analysis was used for secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (time to C max [ t max ], terminal [elimination] half-life [ t ½ ], cumulative amount excreted from time zero to the last quantifiable sample [Ae last ], and fraction of the systemically available drug excreted into the urine [ f e ]). Results No statistically significant differences were observed in C max , AUC t , AUC ∞ , or t max values between subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment and subjects with normal renal function for CBD or its major metabolites, 7-carboxy-CBD (7-COOH-CBD) and 7-hydroxy-CBD (7-OH-CBD), and minor metabolite, 6-hydroxy-CBD (6-OH-CBD); geometric mean ratio for C max values ranged from 0.68 to 1.35. No differences were observed for other secondary parameters (Ae last and f e ). CBD, 7-COOH-CBD, 7-OH-CBD, and 6-OH-CBD were highly protein bound (> 90%); binding was similar in all subject groups. Urine analysis for CBD recorded no appreciable amount, and thus no urinary pharmacokinetic parameters could be derived. Adverse events (AEs) affected two subjects; all five AEs were mild in severity and resolved during the trial. There were no serious AEs or discontinuations due to AEs. Laboratory, physical examination, vital sign, and 12-lead electrocardiogram findings were not clinically significant. Conclusion Renal impairment had no effect on the metabolism of CBD after a single oral 200 mg dose. CBD was generally well tolerated in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. Registration European Union Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) no. 2015-002122-39.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0312-5963
1179-1926
1179-1926
DOI:10.1007/s40262-019-00841-6