Uncertainties and optimized sampling in surface roughness characterization

▶ Engineering surfaces can exhibit significant global- and local parameter variations. ▶ Uncertainties in sampling can be un-expectantly large due to variations in topography. ▶ Optimised sampling strategies both locally and globally decrease uncertainty. ▶ Optimised sampling shows a potential to ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWear Vol. 271; no. 3; pp. 610 - 615
Main Authors Rosén, B.-G., Garnier, J.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 03.06.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:▶ Engineering surfaces can exhibit significant global- and local parameter variations. ▶ Uncertainties in sampling can be un-expectantly large due to variations in topography. ▶ Optimised sampling strategies both locally and globally decrease uncertainty. ▶ Optimised sampling shows a potential to halve the number of measurements needed. ▶ More sophisticated rules than presented here need to be developed for “stop-sampling” criteria. Usage of 3D roughness parameters measurements requires knowledge of uncertainty causes in order to design proper measurement procedures. Even on apparently homogeneous machined surfaces, large local variations in 3D roughness parameters have previously been reported. This paper introduces and tests a concept for optimized sampling based on local-, and global topography analysis, using measurements of the Sa parameter on a large machined component as a practical example. It is shown that more than 40 measurements of Sa may be needed to attain a stable value, but that choice of an appropriate sampling strategy may reduce this requirement considerably. The results point to a possible route to minimize required measurements and contribute to the development of the “best-practice” when using 3D surface structure metrology.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0043-1648
1873-2577
1873-2577
DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2010.07.002