Comparison of the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems used in oral and maxillofacial surgery

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 10; no. 1; p. 18143
• Main Authors: Gareb, Barzi, Roossien, Charlotte C., van Bakelen, Nico B., Verkerke, Gijsbertus J., Vissink, Arjan, Bos, Ruud R. M., van Minnen, Baucke
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 23.10.2020; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 631/61/54/990; 631/61/54/993; 692/308/2778; 692/698/1671/63; 692/699/578; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry; Biodegradability; Biodegradation; Ductility; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation; Fractures; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Mandible; Materials Testing; Maxillofacial; Maxillofacial Injuries - surgery; Mechanical properties; multidisciplinary; Oral Surgical Procedures - instrumentation; Osteosynthesis; Osteotomy; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Surgery; Tensile Strength; Titanium; Titanium - chemistry
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75299-9

To guide the selection of osteosynthesis systems, this study compared the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems. SonicPins Rx and xG were subjected to pull-out tests. Additionally, 15 biodegradable (Inion CPS 2.0 and 2.5 mm; LactoSorb 2.0 mm; Macropore 2.0 mm; Polymax 2.0 mm; BioSorb FX 2.0 mm; ResorbX 2.1 mm; Osteotrans-MX 2.0 mm with plate thicknesses 1.0 and 1.4 mm; SonicWeld Rx plate /Rx pins , xG plate /Rx pins and xG plate /xG pins 2.1 mm without and with tapping the burr hole) and six titanium (CrossDrive (2006), CrossDrive (2018), MaxDrive; all 1.5 and 2.0 mm) straight, four-hole osteosynthesis systems were evaluated. All systems were subjected to tensile, bending and torsion tests. Pull-out loads of the SonicPins were comparable (P = 0.423). Titanium systems’ tensile loads were higher than biodegradable systems (P < 0.001). CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive systems’ tensile and torsional stiffness were lower, accompanied with higher ductility, than corresponding CrossDrive (2006) systems (P < 0.001). Bending stiffness of 1.5 mm titanium systems was comparable to, and of the 2.0 mm systems higher than, all biodegradable systems (P < 0.001). Regarding biodegradable systems, Inion CPS 2.5 mm had highest tensile load and torsional stiffness, SonicWeld 2.1 mm highest tensile stiffness, and BioSorbFX 2.0 mm highest bending stiffness (P < 0.001). On the basis of the results of this study, the CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive 1.5 mm titanium systems are recommended for midface fractures (e.g., zygomatic or maxillary fractures) and osteotomies (e.g., Le Fort I osteotomy), and the CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive 2.0 mm titanium systems for mandibular fractures and osteotomies when a titanium osteosynthesis system is used. When there is an indication for a biodegradable osteosynthesis system, the SonicWeld 2.1 mm or BioSorbFX 2.0 mm are recommended for midface fractures and osteotomies, and the Inion CPS 2.5 mm biodegradable system for mandibular osteotomies and non-load bearing mandibular fractures, especially when high torsional forces are expected (e.g., mandibular symphysis fractures).