Detection of cholesteatoma: High-resolution DWI using RS-EPI and parallel imaging at 3 tesla

• Published in: Journal of neuroradiology Vol. 44; no. 6; pp. 388 - 394
• Main Authors: Algin, O., Aydın, H., Ozmen, E., Ocakoglu, G., Bercin, S., Porter, D.A., Kutluhan, A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: France Elsevier Masson SAS 01.10.2017
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Cholesteatoma; Cholesteatoma - diagnostic imaging; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Echo-Planar Imaging - methods; Female; Humans; Image Enhancement - methods; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Readout-segmented EPI; RESOLVE; Sensitivity and Specificity; Single-shot EPI; Diffusion-weighted imaging; RESOLVE; Cholesteatoma; Single-shot EPI; Readout-segmented EPI
• ISSN: 0150-9861
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.05.006

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of RS-EPI-DWI in the detection of cholesteatoma and to compare with single-shot echo-planar DWI (SS-EPI-DWI). Diffusion-weighted and apparent diffusion-coefficient (ADC) images were obtained using RS-EPI and SS-EPI techniques in 30 patients. Presence of cholesteatoma (3 point scale), amount of artefacts (4 point scale), visibility (4 point scale), and ADC values of the lesions were assessed. The results of both techniques were compared with each other and gold-standard (GS) test results. Lesion visibility and presence of artefact scores of RS-EPI-DWI group were significantly different from those of the SS-EPI group. RS-EPI-DWI images had fewer artefacts and higher visibility scores. The sensitivity, specificity, negative/positive-predictive, and overall-agreement values of RS-EPI-DWI technique were 100%, 78%, 100%, 74%, and 87%; respectively. These values for SS-EPI-DWI technique were 91%, 60%, 88%, 67%, and 75%; respectively. Also, these values were higher on axial plane than coronal plane images for ADC measurements. Based on gold-standard test findings, agreement values were good (κ=0.74) for RS-EPI-DWI and moderate for SS-EP-DWI (κ=0.50) techniques (P<0.001 for both). The RS-EPI-DWI technique allows a higher spatial-resolution and this technique is less susceptible to artefacts when compared with SS-EPI technique.