The grammar of interactive explanatory model analysis

The growing need for in-depth analysis of predictive models leads to a series of new methods for explaining their local and global properties. Which of these methods is the best? It turns out that this is an ill-posed question. One cannot sufficiently explain a black-box machine learning model using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inData mining and knowledge discovery Vol. 38; no. 5; pp. 2596 - 2632
Main Authors Baniecki, Hubert, Parzych, Dariusz, Biecek, Przemyslaw
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.09.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The growing need for in-depth analysis of predictive models leads to a series of new methods for explaining their local and global properties. Which of these methods is the best? It turns out that this is an ill-posed question. One cannot sufficiently explain a black-box machine learning model using a single method that gives only one perspective. Isolated explanations are prone to misunderstanding, leading to wrong or simplistic reasoning. This problem is known as the Rashomon effect and refers to diverse, even contradictory, interpretations of the same phenomenon. Surprisingly, most methods developed for explainable and responsible machine learning focus on a single-aspect of the model behavior. In contrast, we showcase the problem of explainability as an interactive and sequential analysis of a model. This paper proposes how different Explanatory Model Analysis (EMA) methods complement each other and discusses why it is essential to juxtapose them. The introduced process of Interactive EMA (IEMA) derives from the algorithmic side of explainable machine learning and aims to embrace ideas developed in cognitive sciences. We formalize the grammar of IEMA to describe human-model interaction. It is implemented in a widely used human-centered open-source software framework that adopts interactivity, customizability and automation as its main traits. We conduct a user study to evaluate the usefulness of IEMA, which indicates that an interactive sequential analysis of a model may increase the accuracy and confidence of human decision making.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Responsible editor: Martin Atzmueller, Johannes Fürnkranz, Tomáš Kliegr and Ute Schmid.
ISSN:1384-5810
1573-756X
DOI:10.1007/s10618-023-00924-w