Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons

• Published in: Quality of life research Vol. 31; no. 10; pp. 3041 - 3048
• Main Authors: Mulhern, Brendan J., Sampson, Chris, Haywood, Phil, Addo, Rebecca, Page, Katie, Mott, David, Shah, Koonal, Janssen, Mathieu F., Herdman, Mike
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.10.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Decision making; Health economics; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mental health; Public Health; Qualitative research; Quality of life; Quality of Life Research; Quantitative psychology; Questionnaires; Sociology; Validity; Valuation; EQ-5D; Health-related quality of life; Bolt-ons; Psychometrics
• ISSN: 0962-9343; 1573-2649
• DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03138-7

Purpose ‘Bolt-on’ dimensions are additional items added to multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) such as EQ-5D that measure constructs not included in the core descriptive system. The use of bolt-ons has been proposed to improve the content validity and responsiveness of the descriptive system in certain settings and health conditions. EQ-5D bolt-ons serve a particular purpose and thus satisfy a certain set of criteria. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of criteria to guide the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-on descriptors. Methods Criteria were developed using an iterative approach. First, existing criteria were identified from the literature including those used to guide the development of MAUIs, the COSMIN checklist and reviews of existing bolt-ons. Second, processes used to develop bolt-ons based on qualitative and quantitative approaches were considered. The information from these two stages was formalised into draft development and selection criteria. These were reviewed by the project team and iteratively refined. Results Overall, 23 criteria for the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-ons were formulated. Development criteria focused on issues relating to i) structure, ii) language, and iii) consistency with the existing EQ-5D dimension structure. Assessment and selection criteria focused on face and content validity and classical psychometric indicators. Conclusion The criteria generated can be used to guide the development of bolt-ons across different health areas. They can also be used to assess existing bolt-ons, and inform their inclusion in studies and patient groups where the EQ-5D may lack content validity.