Health risk assessment of inhalation exposure to dry fogging of hydrogen peroxide in a dental clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic

• Published in: Environmental science and pollution research international Vol. 29; no. 50; pp. 75338 - 75343
• Main Authors: Hesam, Ghasem, Vahabi Shekarloo, Masoomeh, Atamaleki, Ali, Jalali, Mahdi, Hajipour-Verdom, Behnam, Moradpour, Zahra
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.10.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Aquatic Pollution; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution; Coronaviruses; Cough; COVID-19; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dental Clinics; Dyspnea; Earth and Environmental Science; Ecotoxicology; Environment; Environmental Chemistry; Environmental Health; Environmental science; Exposure; Flow velocity; Fogging; Fritting; Health problems; Health risk assessment; Health risks; Humans; Hydrogen peroxide; Hydrogen Peroxide - analysis; Inhalation; Inhalation Exposure; International organizations; Occupational exposure; Occupational health; Occupational safety; Orthodontics; Pandemics; Periodontics; Prostheses; Prosthetics; Research Article; Respiration; Respiratory function; Risk Assessment; Spraying; Waste Water Technology; Water Management; Water Pollution Control; Dry fog; COVID-19; Dental clinic; Hydrogen peroxide; Inhalation exposure; Health risk assessment
• ISSN: 0944-1344; 1614-7499; 1614-7499
• DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21174-1

After the outbreak of COVID-19, many dental clinics use dry fogging of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) to disinfect the air and surfaces. Inhalation of highly concentrated solutions of H 2 O 2 may cause severe respiratory problems. This study aimed to estimate the health risk assessments of inhalation exposure to dry fogging of H 2 O 2 in a dental clinic. This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study was performed to determine the inhalation exposure and health risk of 9 dental clinic staff with H 2 O 2 in six rooms. Occupational exposure to H 2 O 2 was assessed using the OSHA VI-6 method and a personal pump with the flow rate of 500 mL/min connected to the midget fritted-glass impinger containing 15 mL of TiOSO 4 collecting solution. The health effects of H 2 O 2 exposure were assessed using a respiratory symptoms questionnaire. The health risk assessment of inhaled exposure to H 2 O 2 was also performed using the method provided by the Singapore occupational health department. The mean respiratory exposure of clinic staff to H 2 O 2 was ranged from 1.3 to 2.83 ppm for six rooms which was above the limits recommended by international organizations. Dyspnea (44.4%), cough (33.3%), and nasal burning (22.2%) were the most prevalent health problems. The results also showed a medium risk for endodontics and surgery, and lower risk for periodontics, restorative care, orthodontics, and prosthetics. The results of this study indicate that when using an automated hydrogen peroxide–vapor fogger, calculating the spraying time based on room volume and using the rooms after 30 min of fogging is very important and can greatly reduce the risk ranking.