Perceptions of Hospital-at-Home Among Stakeholders: a Meta-synthesis

• Published in: Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 637 - 650
• Main Authors: Chua, Crystal Min Siu, Ko, Stephanie Qianwen, Lai, Yi Feng, Lim, Yee Wei, Shorey, Shefaly
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.02.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Burnout; Caregivers; Decision making; Health care; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Humans; Internal Medicine; Literature reviews; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Patient Satisfaction; Patients; Quality assessment; Remote monitoring; Synthesis; Systematic Review; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Training; caregivers; perceptions; patients; healthcare administrators; healthcare professionals; experience; hospital-at-home
• ISSN: 0884-8734; 1525-1497; 1525-1497
• DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07065-0

Background Hospital-at-home (HaH) provides acute healthcare in patients’ homes as an alternative to traditional hospital inpatient care. HaH has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, increase patient satisfaction, and reduce hospitalization costs. Despite its effectiveness, the uptake of HaH remains slow and little is known about factors that impact the quality and transferability of HaH. This review aimed to qualitatively synthesize existing literature to examine the perspectives of stakeholders to identify areas of improvement in this model of care. Methodology Six electronic databases (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, Scopus, and Mednar) were searched from inception date until 3 February 2021. The included studies were assessed for quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool. This review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. The meta-synthesis was completed according to Sandelowski and Barroso’s guidelines. Results Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The overarching synthesized theme was “the intricacies of developing HaH,” and the four main themes were (1) factors influencing patient selection, (2) advantages of HaH, (3) challenges of HaH, and (4) enablers for HaH development. Conclusion Overall, high levels of satisfaction were expressed by various stakeholders. Continuity of care remains an important factor for patient-centeredness in HaH. Caregivers should be involved in the decision-making process and supported throughout the HaH duration to prevent caregiver burnout. Collaboration and coordination among healthcare professionals are vital and can be strengthened through training and technological advancements of remote patient monitoring. Institutional and organizational support for stakeholders may make HaH a viable solution to modern healthcare challenges.