Dissolved organic carbon mobilized from organic horizons of mature and harvested black spruce plots in a mesic boreal region
Boreal forests are subject to a wide range of temporally and spatially variable environmental conditions driven by season, climate, and disturbances such as forest harvesting and climate change. We captured dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from surface organic (O) horizons in a boreal forest hillslope...
Saved in:
Published in | Biogeosciences Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 581 - 595 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
05.02.2020
Copernicus Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Boreal forests are subject to a wide range of temporally and
spatially variable environmental conditions driven by season, climate, and
disturbances such as forest harvesting and climate change. We captured
dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from surface organic (O) horizons in a boreal
forest hillslope using passive pan lysimeters in order to identify controls
and hot moments of DOC mobilization from this key C source. We specifically
addressed (1) how DOC fluxes from O horizons vary on a weekly to seasonal
basis in forest and paired harvested plots and (2) how soil temperature,
soil moisture, and water input relate to DOC flux trends in these plots over
time. The total annual DOC flux from O horizons contain contributions from
both vertical and lateral flow and was 30 % greater in the harvested plots
than in the forest plots (54 g C m−2 vs. 38 g C m−2, respectively;
p=0.008). This was despite smaller aboveground C inputs and smaller soil organic carbon stocks in the harvested plots but analogous to larger annual O horizon
water fluxes measured in the harvested plots. Water input, measured as rain, throughfall, and/or snowmelt depending on season and plot type, was
positively correlated to variations in O horizon water fluxes and DOC fluxes
within the study year. Soil temperature was positively correlated to
temporal variations of DOC concentration ([DOC]) of soil water and
negatively correlated with water fluxes, but no relationship existed between
soil temperature and DOC fluxes at the weekly to monthly scale. The relationship between water input to soil and DOC fluxes was seasonally
dependent in both plot types. In summer, a water limitation on DOC flux
existed where weekly periods of no flux alternated with periods of large
fluxes at high DOC concentrations. This suggests that DOC fluxes were water-limited and that increased water fluxes over this period result in
proportional increases in DOC fluxes. In contrast, a flushing of DOC from O
horizons (observed as decreasing DOC concentrations) occurred during
increasing water input and decreasing soil temperature in autumn, prior to
snowpack development. Soils of both plot types remained snow-covered all
winter, which protected soils from frost and limited percolation. The
largest water input and soil water fluxes occurred during spring snowmelt
but did not result in the largest fluxes of DOC, suggesting a production
limitation on DOC fluxes over both the wet autumn and snowmelt periods.
While future increases in annual precipitation could lead to increased DOC
fluxes, the magnitude of this response will be dependent on the type and
intra-annual distribution of this increased precipitation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1726-4189 1726-4170 1726-4189 |
DOI: | 10.5194/bg-17-581-2020 |