Biology and technology in the surgical treatment of malignant bone tumours in children and adolescents, with a special note on the very young

• Published in: Journal of children's orthopaedics Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 322 - 330
• Main Authors: van der Heijden, Lizz, Farfalli, Germán L., Balacó, Inês, Alves, Cristina, Salom, Marta, Lamo-Espinosa, José M., San-Julián, Mikel, van de Sande, Michiel A.J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.08.2021; Sage Publications Ltd; The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
• Subjects: Age; Amputation; Bone cancer; Current Concepts Review; Fractures; Orthopedics; Patients; Pediatrics; Sarcoma; Survival analysis; Teenagers; Tumors; rotationplasty; growing endoprosthesis; epiphysiolysis before resection; allograft; malignant bone tumours
• ISSN: 1863-2521; 1863-2548
• DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.210095

Abstract Purpose The main challenge in reconstruction after malignant bone tumour resection in young children remains how and when growth-plates can be preserved and which options remain if impossible. Methods We describe different strategies to assure best possible long-term function for young children undergoing resection of malignant bone tumours. Results Different resources are available to treat children with malignant bones tumours: a) preoperative planning simulates scenarios for tumour resection and limb reconstruction, facilitating decision-making for surgical and reconstructive techniques in individual patients; b) allograft reconstruction offers bone-stock preservation for future needs. Most allografts are intact at long-term follow-up, but limb-length inequalities and corrective/revision surgery are common in young patients; c) free vascularized fibula can be used as stand-alone reconstruction, vascularized augmentation of structural allograft or devitalized autograft. Longitudinal growth and joint remodelling potential can be preserved, if transferred with vascularized proximal physis; d) epiphysiolysis before resection with continuous physeal distraction provides safe resection margins and maintains growth-plate and epiphysis; e) 3D printing may facilitate joint salvage by reconstruction with patient-specific instruments. Very short stems can be created for fixation in (epi-)metaphysis, preserving native joints; f) growing endoprosthesis can provide for remaining growth after resection of epi-metaphyseal tumours. At ten-year follow-up, limb survival was 89%, but multiple surgeries are often required; g) rotationplasty and amputation should be considered if limb salvage is impossible and/or would result in decreased function and quality of life. Conclusion Several biological and technological reconstruction options must be merged and used to yield best outcomes when treating young children with malignant bone tumours. Level of Evidence Level V Expert opinion