Association Between Cognitive Impairment and Dysphagia: A Two‐Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

ABSTRACT Introduction Previous observational studies have implied a correlation between cognitive impairment and dysphagia, but some have indicated no correlation between the two. Such contradictory findings may have been influenced by small sample sizes and potential confounders. In this Mendelian...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain and behavior Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. e70295 - n/a
Main Authors Tian, Yueqin, Hu, Jiahui, Wang, Qianqian, Qiao, Jia, Wen, Hongmei, Ye, Qiuping, Dou, Zulin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.02.2025
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Introduction Previous observational studies have implied a correlation between cognitive impairment and dysphagia, but some have indicated no correlation between the two. Such contradictory findings may have been influenced by small sample sizes and potential confounders. In this Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, we genetically estimated a causal relationship between cognitive impairment and dysphagia. Methods The study included a large meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) of cognitive impairment in 269,867 individuals of European ancestry and pooled data from a GWAS of dysphagia in 165,765 individuals of European ancestry (cases 3497, controls 161,968). We then used five different complementary MR methods, including IVW, MR‐Egger, MR‐RAPS, weighted median, and weighted mean, to estimate causality between cognitive impairment and dysphagia and finally also assessed heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy by extensive sensitivity tests. Results No evidence of heterogeneity in the effect of instrumental variables was found in Cochran's Q test; therefore, a fixed effects model was used. IVW analysis (OR: 1.206, 95% CI: [1.041, 1.371], p = 0.00508) found that cognitive impairment was associated with an increased risk of dysphagia and that there was a causal association between the two. Also, the weighted median (OR: 1.248, 95% CI: [1.012, 1.484], p = 0.0253), weighted mode (OR: 1.216, 95% CI: [1.043, 1.389], p = 0.0412), and MR‐RAPS (OR: 1.225, 95% CI: [1.069, 1.381], p = 0.00627) validated the conclusions. Furthermore, extensive sensitivity analyses found no evidence of heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy, confirming the reliability of this MR result. Conclusion Our MR study demonstrated a causal effect of cognitive impairment on dysphagia from a genetic perspective, suggesting that individuals with a history of cognitive impairment require specific clinical attention to prevent the development of dysphagia. Large‐scale GWAS and MR analysis link cognitive impairment to increased dysphagia risk, suggesting a genetic causal effect and clinical implications for prevention.
Bibliography:Yueqin Tian, Zulin Dou, Qiuping Ye and Jiahui Hu have contributed equally to this work.
This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2020YFC2004205), the Youth Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82202807), and the Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou (grant number 202007030007).
Funding
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Funding: This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2020YFC2004205), the Youth Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82202807), and the Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou (grant number 202007030007).
ISSN:2162-3279
2162-3279
DOI:10.1002/brb3.70295