Phylogenetic relationships within Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) reveal unexpected generic diversity

Morphology can be misleading in the representation of phylogenetic relationships, especially in simple organisms like cnidarians and particularly in hydrozoans. These suspension feeders are widely distributed in many marine ecosystems, and the family Aglaopheniidae Marktanner‐Turneretscher, 1890 is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inZoologica scripta Vol. 45; no. 1; pp. 103 - 114
Main Authors Postaire, Bautisse, Magalon, Helene, Bourmaud, Chloe A.-F., Gravier-Bonnet, Nicole, Bruggemann, J. Henrich
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oslo Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Morphology can be misleading in the representation of phylogenetic relationships, especially in simple organisms like cnidarians and particularly in hydrozoans. These suspension feeders are widely distributed in many marine ecosystems, and the family Aglaopheniidae Marktanner‐Turneretscher, 1890 is among the most diverse and visible, especially on tropical coral reefs. The taxonomy of this family is based on morphological characters with emphasis on reproductive structures for the identification of genera. This study is the most comprehensive molecular phylogeny of the Aglaopheniidae to date, including six genera and 38 species, of which 13 were investigated for the first time and sampled on tropical coral reefs throughout the Indo‐Pacific region. For newly sampled individuals, we sequenced the 16S rRNA, the nuclear locus comprising the complete ITS1‐5.8S rRNA gene‐ITS2 and the first intron of the calmodulin nuclear gene. Phylogenetic analyses of the data revealed and confirmed a general polyphyly, or doubtful monophyly, of all sampled genera in tropical regions based on both the mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Our results revealed that several morphological characters used today are unsuited to resolve phylogenetic relationships between species and genera, as well as the high phyletic diversity within this family. Future revision of the classification of this family will require extensive geographic sampling and the use of an integrative approach.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ZSC12135
Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS)
French network Bibliothèque du Vivant
ark:/67375/WNG-N8W0GR9H-D
istex:4613C2880047E53A5247660DC8A6CD96EAE3D80C
Institut national de recherche agronomique (INRA)
STS Doctoral School of the University of Reunion Island
Laboratoire d'Excellence CORAIL
Fig. S1. Molecular phylogeny of 18 tropical Aglaopheniidae species generated by PhyML from 16S sequences.Fig. S2. Molecular phylogeny of 18 tropical Aglaopheniidae species generated by PhyML from CAM sequences.Fig. S3. Molecular phylogeny of 18 tropical Aglaopheniidae species generated by PhyML from ITS sequences.Table S1. Number of newly sampled individuals per location.Table S2. List of individuals per species used in this study, sampling site and GenBank accession numbers of 16S, calmodulin and ITS genes sequences.
Centre National de Séquençage (CEA)
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN)
ISSN:0300-3256
1463-6409
DOI:10.1111/zsc.12135