A global repository of novel antimicrobial emergence events [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]

Despite considerable global surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), data on the global emergence of new resistance genotypes in bacteria has not been systematically compiled. We conducted a study of English-language scientific literature (2006-2017) and ProMED-mail disease surveillance repor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inF1000 research Vol. 9; p. 1320
Main Authors Mendelsohn, Emma, Ross, Noam, White, Allison M, Whiting, Karissa, Basaraba, Cale, Watson Madubuonwu, Brooke, Johnson, Erica, Dualeh, Mushtaq, Matson, Zach, Dattaray, Sonia, Ezeokoli, Nchedochukwu, Kirshenbaum Lieberman, Melanie, Kotcher, Jacob, Maher, Samantha, Zambrana-Torrelio, Carlos, Daszak, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Faculty of 1000 Ltd 2020
F1000 Research Limited
F1000 Research Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite considerable global surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), data on the global emergence of new resistance genotypes in bacteria has not been systematically compiled. We conducted a study of English-language scientific literature (2006-2017) and ProMED-mail disease surveillance reports (1994-2017) to identify global events of novel AMR emergence (first clinical reports of unique drug-bacteria resistance combinations). We screened 24,966 abstracts and reports, ultimately identifying 1,757 novel AMR emergence events from 268 peer-reviewed studies and 26 disease surveillance reports (294 total). Events were reported in 66 countries, with most events in the United States (152), China (128), and India (127). The most common bacteria demonstrating new resistance were Klebsiella pneumoniae (344) and Escherichia coli (218). Resistance was most common against antibiotic drugs imipenem (89 events), ciprofloxacin (84) and ceftazidime (83). We provide an open-access database of emergence events with standardized fields for bacterial species, drugs, location, and date. We discuss the impact of reporting and surveillance bias on database coverage, and we suggest guidelines for data analysis. This database may be broadly useful for understanding rates and patterns of AMR evolution, identifying global drivers and correlates, and targeting surveillance and interventions.
Bibliography:new_version
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
No competing interests were disclosed.
ISSN:2046-1402
2046-1402
DOI:10.12688/f1000research.26870.2