The structure of liquid carbon dioxide and carbon disulfide

We present neutron and x-ray scattering data (a 2N+X experiment) of liquid CO(2) and CS(2) at a density of about 10 molecules/nm(3). Because the scattering length contrast of the carbon isotope is very small and, in fact, smaller than anticipated from standard scattering length tables, a direct part...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of chemical physics Vol. 130; no. 17; p. 174503
Main Authors Neuefeind, J, Fischer, H E, Simonson, J M, Idrissi, A, Schöps, A, Honkimäki, V
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 07.05.2009
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We present neutron and x-ray scattering data (a 2N+X experiment) of liquid CO(2) and CS(2) at a density of about 10 molecules/nm(3). Because the scattering length contrast of the carbon isotope is very small and, in fact, smaller than anticipated from standard scattering length tables, a direct partial structure factor determination via matrix inversion gives unconvincing results. Instead we search for the best representation of the three independent scattering data sets by a simulation of rigid molecules interacting via a 12-6-1 potential, furthermore restricting the pressure p, the density rho, and the temperature T to the experimental values. We show that a 12-6-1 potential is completely adequate to describe the structure of CO(2); for CS(2) we find that the best 12-6-1 potential still slightly overestimates the height of the sulfur-sulfur pair-distribution function g(SS). Orientational correlations reflect the similarities much more than the differences of the two molecular systems. The distinct differences in the atom-atom pair distribution functions of CO(2) and CS(2) do not mean that their structures are radically different and the comparison with the crystalline structures is somewhat deceptive. A linear transformation, wherein all the parameters describing the interaction and the geometry of CS(2) are changed to those of CO(2), allows us to point out the physical parameters which may be responsible for the differences or similarities in thermodynamic behavior (pressure) and structures (orientations) between the two liquids.
ISSN:1089-7690
DOI:10.1063/1.3116106