Reduction in foraminal height after lateral access surgery does not affect quality of life: A 2-year outcome study on lateral lumbar interbody fusion

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) Vol. 27; no. 1; p. 2309499019829336
• Main Authors: Jeremy Goh, Keng Meng, Liow, Ming Han Lincoln, Xu, Sheng, Yeo, William, Ling, Zhixing Marcus, Soh, Chee Cheong Reuben, Tan, Seang Beng, Guo, Chang Ming
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2019; Sage Publications Ltd; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Decompression, Surgical; Female; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Radiography; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fusion; Spinal Stenosis - etiology; Spinal Stenosis - surgery; Surgery; Treatment Outcome; fusion outcomes; extreme lateral interbody fusion; foramina height; lateral lumbar interbody fusion; lateral access surgery; quality of life
• ISSN: 2309-4990; 1022-5536; 2309-4990
• DOI: 10.1177/2309499019829336

Introduction: Reduction in neuroforaminal height (FH) may diminish the indirect decompression benefit that lateral access surgery (LAS) provides. However, the relationship between postoperative FH reduction in LAS and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes remains unclear. Objectives: To determine whether FH reduction affects HRQoL outcomes at 2-year follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review of 45 patients who underwent LAS for degenerative lumbar spine conditions was performed. The cohort was divided into two groups: maintenance (A) and reduction (B) in FH. Outcome measures included numerical pain rating scale (NPRS back and leg pain), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), North American Spine Society (NASS) score for neurogenic symptoms (NS), patient satisfaction, and expectation fulfilment for surgery. Mean disc height (DH), FH, and fusion were evaluated on plain radiographs. Radiological fusion was assessed with the Bridwell fusion classification. Unpaired student’s t-test was used to compare between groups and one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc correction was used to determine differences between time intervals within each group. Results: The average pre-op mean FH was 16.9 ± 3.5 mm. Group A had 25 patients showing postoperative maintenance of FH (19.4 ± 3.3 mm to 20.2 ± 3.2 mm; 4% increase) at 2-year postsurgery while group B had 20 patients showing decrease in FH (21.1 ± 3.3 mm to 18.7 ± 3.5 mm; 11% decrease). Group A mean DH improved from 7.0 ± 2.0 mm to 10.3 ± 1.6 mm (47% increase). Group B mean DH improved from 6.8 ± 2.3 mm to 11.0 ± 3.0 mm (62% increase). There were no significant differences in NPRS, ODI, NASS, SF-36, and SF-36 MCS/PCS between groups at 2 years (p > 0.05); 92% of group A and 85% of group B patients reported good satisfaction and fulfilment of expectations (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Despite an initial increase in FH after LAS surgery, 45% of patients had FH reduction at 2 years. However, FH reduction up to 11% did not affect short-term HRQoL outcomes.