Neural substrates of defensive reactivity in two subtypes of specific phobia

Depending on threat proximity, different defensive behaviours are mediated by a descending neural network involving forebrain (distal threat) vs midbrain areas (proximal threat). Compared to healthy subjects, it can be assumed that phobics are characterized by shortened defensive distances on a beha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience Vol. 9; no. 11; pp. 1668 - 1675
Main Authors Lueken, Ulrike, Hilbert, Kevin, Stolyar, Veronika, Maslowski, Nina I., Beesdo-Baum, Katja, Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.11.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1749-5016
1749-5024
1749-5024
DOI10.1093/scan/nst159

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Depending on threat proximity, different defensive behaviours are mediated by a descending neural network involving forebrain (distal threat) vs midbrain areas (proximal threat). Compared to healthy subjects, it can be assumed that phobics are characterized by shortened defensive distances on a behavioural and neural level. This study aimed at characterizing defensive reactivity in two subtypes of specific phobia [snake (SP) and dental phobics (DP)]. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), n = 39 subjects (13 healthy controls, HC; 13 SP; 13 DP) underwent an event-related fMRI task employing an anticipation (5–10 s) and immediate perception phase (phobic pictures and matched neutral stimuli; 1250 ms) to modulate defensive distance. Although no differential brain activity in any comparisons was observed in DP, areas associated with defensive behaviours (e.g. amygdala, hippocampus, midbrain) were activated in SP. Decreasing defensive distance in SP was characterized by a shift to midbrain activity. Present findings substantiate differences between phobia types in their physiological and neural organization that can be expanded to early stages of defensive behaviours. Findings may contribute to a better understanding of the dynamic organization of defensive reactivity in different types of phobic fear.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1749-5016
1749-5024
1749-5024
DOI:10.1093/scan/nst159