Bonding integrity and compressive strength of re-bonded, surface conditioned and Er Cr YSGG laser treated lithium disilicate ceramics

• Published in: Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials Vol. 18; p. 2280800020910954
• Main Authors: Albaker, Abdulaziz M., Al Deeb, Laila, Alhenaki, Aasem M, Aldeeb, Modhi, Al Ahdal, Khold, Abduljabbar, Tariq, Vohra, Fahim
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 2020; Sage Publications Ltd; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Bonding strength; Cement; Ceramic bonding; Ceramics; Ceramics - chemistry; Compressive strength; Compressive Strength - radiation effects; Conditioning; Dental Porcelain - chemistry; Disks; Hydrofluoric acid; Hydrofluoric Acid - chemistry; Integrity; Lasers; Lasers, Solid-State; Lithium; Resin Cements - chemistry; Resins; Scanning electron microscopy; Silanes - chemistry; Surface Properties; Surface treatment; compressive strength; adhesive bond; surface treatment; resin cement; Er Cr YSGG laser; re-bonding
• ISSN: 2280-8000; 2280-8000
• DOI: 10.1177/2280800020910954

Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the shear bond strength (SBS) and compressive strength (CS) of Er Cr YSGG laser (ECL) treated, re-bonded lithium disilicate (LD) ceramic in comparison to standard conventional conditioning (hydrofluoric acid (HFA) and silane). Methods: One hundred LD ceramic disks were divided equally for SBS and CS testing. Eighty samples were conventionally surface treated and bonded to resin cement followed by de-bonding of the cement build-up. All de-bonded specimens were divided into four groups based on re-bonding surface treatments (HFA, primer, adhesive, and ECL). Resin cement build-ups were performed in 40 specimens for SBS testing (universal testing machine); however, the remaining 40 specimens were tested for CS. Ten specimens each were used as controls (surface treatment was performed once and no primary resin cement bonding) for SBS and CS assessment. Surface topography was assessed using a scanning electron microscope. Results: The maximum and minimum SBS values were shown by groups: control (33.42 ± 3.28 megapascals (MPa)); and ECL (17.50 ± 2.22 MPa) respectively. The maximum and minimum CSs were displayed by specimens in the ECL group (439.45 ± 70.68 MPa) and the control group (237.28 ± 19.96 MPa), respectively. For ECL specimens, SBS was significantly lower and CS was significantly higher as compared to control specimens. Conclusions: Application of the Er Cr YSGG laser significantly improved the CS of de-bonded ceramic specimens. However, it did not show a positive influence on the bond integrity of re-bonded ceramics in comparison to conventional surface treatment regimes.