Morphometric study of the orientation of lumbar zygapophyseal joints in a South Indian population

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) Vol. 25; no. 3; p. 2309499017739483
• Main Authors: Mohanty, SP, Pai Kanhangad, Madhava, Kamath, Siddarth, Kamath, Asha
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.09.2017; Sage Publications Ltd; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Authorship; Back pain; Body Weights and Measures; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Fractures; Humans; India; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - epidemiology; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - epidemiology; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging; Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology; Male; Medical imaging; Middle Aged; Morphology; Population; Retrospective Studies; Spinal cord injuries; Spinal Cord Injuries - diagnostic imaging; Studies; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Variance analysis; Vertebrae; Zygapophyseal Joint - diagnostic imaging; Zygapophyseal Joint - pathology; zygapophyseal joint angle; zygapophyseal joint; facet tropism; computerized tomographic scans
• ISSN: 2309-4990; 1022-5536; 2309-4990
• DOI: 10.1177/2309499017739483

Purpose: To determine the orientation of lumbar zygapophyseal joints and prevalence of facet tropism (FT) identified by computerized tomographic (CT) scans. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 124 CT scans of patients with spinal injuries, seen between 2011and 2015, were retrospectively studied. A total of 566 uninjured motion segments were analysed. The right and left zygapophyseal joint angles (ZJAs) from L1–L2 to L5–S1 were measured on axial sections at uninjured levels. The absolute difference between the right and left ZJA was calculated to determine the prevalence and severity of FT at each level. Results: The mean ZJA (mean ± SD) at L1–L2, L2–L3, L3–L4, L4–L5 and L5–S1 was 23.55 ± 7.21, 27.97 ± 6.95, 39.47 ± 6.07, 48.32 ± 6.38 and 53.45 ± 6.67, respectively. Prevalence of FT at L1–L2, L2–L3, L3–L4, L4–L5 and L5–S1 was 22.42%, 25%, 27.19%, 47.82% and 38.5%, respectively. One-way repeated analysis of variance test showed a statistically significant difference in mean ZJA (p < 0.05) and prevalence of FT (p < 0.05) at different levels of the lumbar spine. Conclusions: This study confirms that ZJA is not the same at different levels of the lumbar spine. The mean ZJA progressively increases from L1–L2 to L5–S1. This could explain the greater range of movements in the lumbar spine at the lower levels. The higher prevalence of FT at L4–L5 and L5–S1 seen in this study could explain the greater incidence of disc prolapse and other degenerative disorders at these levels.