DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae

Abstract Corneal guttae, which are the abnormal growth of extracellular matrix in the corneal endothelium, are observed in specular images as black droplets that occlude the endothelial cells. To estimate the corneal parameters (endothelial cell density [ECD], coefficient of variation [CV], and hexa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 14035
Main Authors Vigueras-Guillén, Juan P., van Rooij, Jeroen, van Dooren, Bart T. H., Lemij, Hans G., Islamaj, Esma, van Vliet, Lucas J., Vermeer, Koenraad A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group 18.08.2022
Nature Publishing Group UK
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Corneal guttae, which are the abnormal growth of extracellular matrix in the corneal endothelium, are observed in specular images as black droplets that occlude the endothelial cells. To estimate the corneal parameters (endothelial cell density [ECD], coefficient of variation [CV], and hexagonality [HEX]), we propose a new deep learning method that includes a novel attention mechanism (named fNLA), which helps to infer the cell edges in the occluded areas. The approach first derives the cell edges, then infers the well-detected cells, and finally employs a postprocessing method to fix mistakes. This results in a binary segmentation from which the corneal parameters are estimated. We analyzed 1203 images (500 contained guttae) obtained with a Topcon SP-1P microscope. To generate the ground truth, we performed manual segmentation in all images. Several networks were evaluated (UNet, ResUNeXt, DenseUNets, UNet++, etc.) and we found that DenseUNets with fNLA provided the lowest error: a mean absolute error of 23.16 [cells/mm $$^{2}$$ 2 ] in ECD, 1.28 [%] in CV, and 3.13 [%] in HEX. Compared with Topcon’s built-in software, our error was 3–6 times smaller. Overall, our approach handled notably well the cells affected by guttae, detecting cell edges partially occluded by small guttae and discarding large areas covered by extensive guttae.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-18180-1