Randomized Controlled Trial of Preconception Interventions in Infertile Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Context: Lifestyle modification is recommended in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) prior to conception but there are few randomized trials to support its implementation or benefit. Objective: This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of preconception intervention on reproductive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism Vol. 100; no. 11; pp. 4048 - 4058
Main Authors Legro, Richard S, Dodson, William C, Kris-Etherton, Penny M, Kunselman, Allen R, Stetter, Christy M, Williams, Nancy I, Gnatuk, Carol L, Estes, Stephanie J, Fleming, Jennifer, Allison, Kelly C, Sarwer, David B, Coutifaris, Christos, Dokras, Anuja
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Endocrine Society 01.11.2015
Copyright by The Endocrine Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Context: Lifestyle modification is recommended in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) prior to conception but there are few randomized trials to support its implementation or benefit. Objective: This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of preconception intervention on reproductive and metabolic abnormalities in overweight/obese women with PCOS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a randomized controlled trial of preconception and infertility treatment at Academic Health Centers in women with infertility due to PCOS, age 18–40 y and body mass index 27–42 kg/m2. Intervention: Women were randomly assigned to receive either 16 weeks of 1) continuous oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) (ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg/1 mg norethindrone acetate) (“OCP”); 2) lifestyle modification consisting of caloric restriction with meal replacements, weight loss medication (either sibutramine, or orlistat), and increased physical activity to promote a 7% weight loss (“Lifestyle”); or 3) combined treatment with both OCP and lifestyle modification (“Combined”). After preconception intervention, women underwent standardized ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate and timed intercourse for four cycles. Pregnancies were followed with trimester visits until delivery. Main Outcome Measures: Weight, ovulation, and live birth were measured. Results: We consented 216 and randomly assigned 149 women (Lifestyle: n = 50; OCP: n = 49; Combined: n = 50). We achieved significant weight loss with both Lifestyle (mean weight loss, −6.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.4–−5.0; and Combined (mean weight loss, −6.4%; 95% CI, −7.6–−5.2) compared with baseline and OCP (both P < .001). There was a significant increase in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome at the end of preconception treatment compared with baseline within OCP (odds ratio [OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.42–4.27) whereas no change in metabolic syndrome was detected in the Lifestyle (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.63–2.19) or Combined (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.44–1.17) groups. Cumulative ovulation rates were superior after weight loss: OCP, 46%; Lifestyle, 60%; and Combined, 67% (P < .05). Live birth rates were OCP, 12%; Lifestyle, 26%; and Combined, 24% (P = .13). Conclusions: A preconception weight loss intervention eliminates the adverse metabolic oral contraceptive effects and, compared with oral contraceptive pretreatment, leads to higher ovulation rates.
Bibliography:This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Center for Research Resources, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences at the National Institutes of Health through Grants R01 HD056510 (to R.S.L.), UL1 TR000127 (Penn State Clinical and Translational Institute), and U54 HD29834 (UVA Core Ligand Assay Core of the Specialized Cooperative Centers Program in Reproduction of the NICHD). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/jc.2015-2778