Using a 3-D spherical plasmoid to interpret the Sun-to-Earth propagation of the 4 November 1997 coronal mass ejection event

We present the time‐dependent propagation of a Sun‐Earth connection event that occurred on 4 November 1997 using a three‐dimensional (3‐D) numerical magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulation. A global steady state solar wind for this event is obtained by a 3‐D SIP‐CESE MHD model with Parker's 1‐D s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Vol. 117; no. A1
Main Authors Zhou, Y. F., Feng, X. S., Wu, S. T., Du, D., Shen, F., Xiang, C. Q.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2012
American Geophysical Union
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We present the time‐dependent propagation of a Sun‐Earth connection event that occurred on 4 November 1997 using a three‐dimensional (3‐D) numerical magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulation. A global steady state solar wind for this event is obtained by a 3‐D SIP‐CESE MHD model with Parker's 1‐D solar wind solution and measured photospheric magnetic fields as the initial values. Then, superposed on the quiet background solar wind, a spherical plasmoid is used to mimic the 4 November 1997 coronal mass ejection (CME) event. The CME is assumed to arise from the evolution of a spheromak magnetic structure with high‐speed, high‐pressure, and high‐plasma‐density plasmoid near the Sun. Moreover, the axis of the initial simulated CME is put at S14W34 to conform to the observed location of this flare/CME event. The result has provided us with a relatively satisfactory comparison with the Wind spacecraft observations, such as southward interplanetary magnetic field and large‐scale smooth rotation of the magnetic field associated with the CME. Key Points A global steady state solar wind is obtained by a 3‐D SIP‐CESE MHD model A spherical plasmoid is used to mimic 4 November 1997 CME event A relatively satisfactory comparison with the Wind observations is provided
Bibliography:ArticleID:2010JA016380
istex:C3BF06D8D11B8E3656BDFF08AFC524E60E2BB222
ark:/67375/WNG-GS8KHTDK-P
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0148-0227
2169-9380
2156-2202
2169-9402
DOI:10.1029/2010JA016380